Re: how can I curb a crank who believes in Earth expansion pseudo-theory?

In article <mGCQh.1562$P04.383@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"James" <james.maxlow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1175646554.870591.119710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Apr 3, 1:29 am, "Pascal Boulerie" <Pascal.Boule...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hello,

I need advices to curb a crank who believes in Earth expansion pseudo-
theory.

Grasshopper, you know nothing. May I suggest that before you go
expressing YOUR opinion that you do your homework and actually
quantify your statement by providing factual evidence to disprove EE.

Grasshopper eater, before you attempt to tell others what they should and
should not do, perhaps you should point out how the rules have changed such
that people who support the current established paradigm are required to
prove or disprove anyone else's theory. It is for EE supporters to provide
not only a theory that better explains the facts than does plate tectonics
and make testable and repeatable predictions from that theory, it is also
up to EErs to provide such an explanation in such a manner that it is
falsifiable, testable, and repeatable by others. Well? We are still
waiting, Mr. Maxlow, if that is truly who you are?

I think that it's also up to the EEers to present a concise statement of
their hypothesis. Throughout the long debate on this subject, they have
consistently left that up to others, and then screamed "straw man!" when
the hypothesis being disproved had been presented by their debating
opponents.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com
Level 1 Linux technical support: Read The Fscking Manual!
Level 2 Linux technical support: Write The Fscking Code Yourself!
.

Relevant Pages
Loading