Re: And now for a different explanation for expansion



On 26 Apr 2007 13:18:05 -0700, oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Apr 26, 5:28 pm, J. Taylor <nchiw...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 26 Apr 2007 08:28:56 -0700, oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:





On Apr 26, 6:16 am, J. Taylor <nchiw...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://understandearth.com/Solar%20System%20Processes.htm

http://understandearth.com/Whole-Earth%20Decompression%20Dynamics.htm

Neither the stationary Earth/convection cell mechanism or what you
propose for your expanding Earth conclusion satisfies the two largest
known geological features,the deviation of the Earth's shape profiles
by the surface fractured crust and the mid Atlantic ridge
simultaneously.

Differential rotation in the high temperature/flexible composition
satisfies both crustal motion/evolution as the major component in
surface feature development.The ee precept does nothing only attempt
to explain the geographical seperation of continents while treating
the solar system like a background puppet theatre.

Still,at least you are not stationary Earth guys like the convection
cell children.

Gerald,

Have you considered the possibility you are wrong? If so, what were
the tests used to decide the issue one way or the other?


Mr Taylor

I do not act in a manner that goes out to promote a mechanism in order
to prove somebody wrong,the differential rotation mechanism which I
promote in the high temperature/flexible interior ties togehter
crustal motion/evolution with the Earth's shape.As you will soon
discover,you have to include the 40 km deviation from a perfect sphere
as a geological feature insofar as the fractured crust profiles the
shape regardless of the underlying mechanism,as far as I am
concerned,neither the stationary Earth /convection cells mechanism or
the ee conclusion satisfies the evolution of surface features or the
planetary deviation.


If not, you need to do so. It will require assuming your position is
wrong and looking for anything which will show it.


That is falsification and it is rife in this empirical era.None of the
great advances in human civilisation let alone in the discovery of
natural phenomena can be made by people who have this convenient
clause to promote stumbing towards certainties by getting rid of
uncertainties.

Groping your way along by guesswork may be the height of fashion but
the insight by Steno on stratification and to a certain extent the
basic outlines supplied by Wegener are broad enough and dramatic
enough from previous working principles as to be enjoyable.I do not
suffer false modesty and I will tell you that the planetary deviation
from a perfect sphere indicates the rotational mechanism of the
flexible interior which in turn is the active dynamic for crustal
motion/evolution and visa versa.

I completely understand the reasons why convection cells were
introduced to explain crustal motion but they are geographically
obscure and do not take into account rotational dynamics and
orientation.It is the geological equivalent of pre-Copernican notions
and it is the way I view both the convection cell mechanism for
crustal motion while I have no regard for ee.Copernicus expresses the
deficiencies of groping your way around without an accurate wider
perspective -



" . although they have extracted from them the apparent motions, with
numerical agreement, nevertheless . . . . They are just like someone
including in a picture hands, feet, head, and other limbs from
different places, well painted indeed, but not modeled from the same
body, and not in the least matching each other, so that a monster
would
be produced from them rather than a man. Thus in the process of their
demonstrations, which they call their system, they are found either
to
have missed out something essential, or to have brought in something
inappropriate and wholly irrelevant, which would not have happened to
them if they had followed proper principles. For if the hypotheses
which they assumed had not been fallacies, everything which follows
from them could be independently verified." De revolutionibus, 1543



It is not the trying to make it work, but the trying to break it,
which will show its strength.

JT- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The convection cell guys have excellent data and correlations but a
lousy sub-geocentric ad hoc mechanism which actually undermines the
appreciate of crustal motion and the creation of surface features,the
ee proponents place the conclusion as a priority with little regard
for how it achieves it.

IIn taking the widest view possible,looking at the behavior of a
rotating celestial object and how a composition will behave from a
maximum speed and geographical diameter to the lowest speed where the
rotational orientation surfaces,I can determine that the Earth will be
no exception.I have used the exposed plasma of the Sun as a guide but
have yet to see somebody with enough common sense to take the widest
possible view and then apply it to the high temparture /flexible
interior perpendicular to the rotational oreintation of the Earth.



That was certainly a long winded reply, when a simple no would have
sufficed.

JT

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: And now for a different explanation for expansion
    ... propose for your expanding Earth conclusion satisfies the two largest ... to prove somebody wrong,the differential rotation mechanism which I ... discover,you have to include the 40 km deviation from a perfect sphere ... Founder of the True Geology ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: And now for a different explanation for expansion
    ... propose for your expanding Earth conclusion satisfies the two largest ... to prove somebody wrong,the differential rotation mechanism which I ... crustal motion/evolution with the Earth's shape.As you will soon ... discover,you have to include the 40 km deviation from a perfect sphere ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: And now for a different explanation for expansion
    ... propose for your expanding Earth conclusion satisfies the two largest ... crustal motion/evolution with the Earth's shape.As you will soon ... discover,you have to include the 40 km deviation from a perfect sphere ... rotation is all it takes to move the continents, ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: And now for a different explanation for expansion
    ... propose for your expanding Earth conclusion satisfies the two largest ... to prove somebody wrong,the differential rotation mechanism which I ... crustal motion/evolution with the Earth's shape.As you will soon ... discover,you have to include the 40 km deviation from a perfect sphere ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: And now for a different explanation for expansion
    ... propose for your expanding Earth conclusion satisfies the two largest ... to prove somebody wrong,the differential rotation mechanism which I ... discover,you have to include the 40 km deviation from a perfect sphere ... crustal motion while I have no regard for ee.Copernicus expresses the ...
    (sci.geo.geology)