Re: EEK! EEUFBOG! (SHHLA .....!)


don findlay wrote:
Erosion is the Essential Key (EEK!) to understanding Earth Expansion,
'cos properly speaking, when it rains, all the hills would be reduced
to zilch, and the continongs would end up just like a big beach.
Wouldn't they? I mean, you'd have to do a bit of arithmetic of
course, ..plug in a few numbahs, .. to see the balance between the
distribution, how much beach you'd get against how much land
remaining, with floaties making up the continents and so on, ..and
then you'd have to *RUMBAH DA NUMBAHS" to see if it would actually
work, taking into account things like wind, and how high sand dunes
could grow along the beach. I know where I am there are sand dunes
higher than yer actual coast, so I don't see too much trouble with
turning all the land into beach (dunes) with all the wind there'd
be, ..except maybe it wouldn't rain enough with the mountains having
been eroded off and stuff, and then river force would get piss-weak
where it comes out into the sea, so it would all bank up. But then
currents would move it away in a storm maybe.. That's one for
oceanographer
numbahrumbahrs like Grumblestiltskin there.

I reckon that's it, eh? Whoo! Way to go. Incised meanders chopping
out the mountains and the hills like they wuz just beach dunes.
*Should've *Happened *Long *Ago (SHHLA...!) Plate Tectonics doesn't
have an answer to why erosion (globally) doesn't do this
(globally) .... just piddling little bits here and there it calls
'isostatic uplift'. That's where the number pluggers come in, saying
that given enough time archimedes' legs will float to the surface, but
his legs don't cover the whole earth do they, ..and even if they did
the fish would eat them and they would die and get washed up on a
beach somewhere and then get reduced to essential elements. So back
to square one, where *Everything *Ends *Up *Flat, *Because *Of
*Gravity (EEUFBOG).

An' why hain't it already? (eeufbog?) Why *ISN'T* everthing flat,
the way it should be, ..the tops of mountains are, ..all over the
place. What's with all this erosion that we keep getting? Why do we
*KEEP* getting it? (And don't give us that nonsense again about
colliding plates crumpling the crust and throwing it up into mountain
belts.) We're long past the Archaean by now. Hills are a bit
different because they've been done over like a dinner already, as
they would be, just mostly being just mountains long past their use-
by, -eroded - so you don't see it in them. BUT. And it's a big
***. *A GREAT BIG *** FOR ANYONE PREPARED TO HAVE A GO AT KICKING
IT* - what you *DO* get by way of eeufbog, is a whole stack of
successive or Sequential Erosion Profiles - with zero erosion
potential. Plate Tectonics has no answer to these. (***, ..I don't
think it even recognises them!) (I suppose there's too much gravy
covering the stuff on the table already.)

That's science for you. A bun fight, ..with gravy. And
'scientists' (real scientists, that is), keeping an inventory. See
with the potential for keeping records these days, how many of them
are going to end up looking right nig-nogs in the future....!
Whooaaraahh! ... The Professor of Who, and the Dean of Where, ...
makes you wonder who's going to apply for jobs like those, with the
capacity for their estate being sued by all those students they taught
all that garhbage to, and who now can't get a job on account of it, ..
and their children and grandchildren (of both of them) being left
destitute on account of all that gravy. (Yeah, ..gravy, ..share it
around,)... instead of keeping it just a heap of incomprehensible
code nobody's supposed to understand except by those with their
fingers in it.

http://users.indigo.net.au/don/to/blobnz.html

.