Re: evidences against subduction theory

Jo Schaper <jospamnotschaper34@5socket78dot9net> wrote:

I don't argue for EE...no mechanism.

That's not the job of the geophysicists to find a mechanism. Their job
is to provide evidence that there is expansion and to show that geologic
features are better explained using EE.

The mechanism of EE would be related to matter creation and that's the
job of the physicists to figure it out.

--
Florian

"Tout est au mieux dans le meilleur des mondes possibles"
Voltaire vs Leibniz (1-0)
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... That's not the job of the geophysicists to find a mechanism. ... Geophysicists have found no evidence for expansion. ... Try looking at the Earth. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
    ... Is the W or Z particle massless? ... That's why the expansion of space is a much better match for the ... Which means slow light horribly fails every test of expansion like the ... depending where you think the experimental evidence currently sits. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Owens Two-Phase Model of Earth Expansion
    ... >> Aren't you trying to sell an expansion, ... You forget that you are talkiing to geologists? ... >> advocates for alternatives to biological evolution. ... evidence prove that both evolution and the Holocaust are facts. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: FAQS - Earth Expansion
    ... >matters plate tectonics, I don't see much evidence of 'meshing'. ... I knew some folks who work on tectonic modelling and earth ... There is expansion, and there is ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Should GR fit to QM ... or QM fit to GR?
    ... parameters, inflation, dark energy/matter, acceleration of expansion. ... "Stupid" is an alternative, ... Let's add the real evidence to a list. ... The need for inflation (causally connected regions too far apart to ...
    (sci.physics)
Loading