Re: evidences against subduction theory

On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:27:17 -0700, Timberwoof
<timberwoof.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <1i0r6pd.1juuy84tuzl6oN%firstname@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
firstname@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Florian) wrote:

Jo Schaper <jospamnotschaper34@5socket78dot9net> wrote:

I don't argue for EE...no mechanism.

That's not the job of the geophysicists to find a mechanism. Their job
is to provide evidence that there is expansion and to show that geologic
features are better explained using EE.

The mechanism of EE would be related to matter creation and that's the
job of the physicists to figure it out.

The problem is that every experiment that physicists have done to better
understand the nature of matter has shown that there is no mechanism to
support EE.

Did not know they had did them all, nor that they were even actively
engaged in conducting experiments to find a mechanism for EE.

Any way, how do you show no mechanism? Sounds like a contradiction of
terms. Which it is, but to your twisted mind it makes perfect sense.

JT
.

Loading