Re: The Earth is smaller than assumed

In article <1i10e6q.14840sd18t6bx9N%firstname@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
firstname@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Florian) wrote:

Timberwoof <timberwoof.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Actually, I have provided arguments ad nauseum in talk.origins. In one
post I gathered up a dozen or two arguments against EE which were never
directly or satisfactorily answered.

May be because you did not post in the apropriate newsgroup?

I responded to posts made by Taylor and Findlay in that newsgroup.

I don't know anything about it. The only reference I can find for it is
in an expanding-earth web page.

Don't you have access to peer-review journal?

I "have access" but I am not a geologist. What I knew I learned through
osmosis.

Since you can leave a major detail such as the EE"s missing mass to the
physicists, I'll leave this minor detail to oceanographers.

Give me a break. That is basic sedimentology. As a geologist, I expect
you're able to understand it.

You don't understand why I wrote that.

My major complaint about EE is that EEers don't explain definitively how
the expansion is supposed to have happened, whether it was through
reduction of density or increase in actual mass. Whenever I press them
on the issue, they say it is not a matter for geologists to figure out:
they prefer to leave it to the physicists (who are mistaken in their
unfounded belief in conservation of mass and conservation of energy,
according to some EEers).

However, you are right. It is basic stuff and I ought to be able to come
up with those answers. Just as conservation laws are basic stuff and
Taylor and Findlay ought to be able to answer that question. Me, I'll go
with the hypothesis that doesn't violate those laws.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ?Chris L.
an important web site: http://www.muslim-refusenik.com/
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT UFOs on Larry King Live next Wednesday
    ... >>>The resulting change in momentum occurs across time. ... >>>Just like an object reflects in a glass mirror, inertia is that reflecting force of mass. ... >> It's just the conservation laws in action. ... >Because it's just to easy to say the "conservation laws are in action" ...
    (alt.machines.cnc)
  • Re: A Sad Asimov fan
    ... But those conservation laws aren't absolute; ... > black hole evaporation can also violate them. ... baryon number and lepton number are conserved is that we've never seen ... The same could be true of even more beloved conservation laws, ...
    (rec.arts.sf.fandom)
  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... However, what we do know, rules out Expanding Earth ... There are no physic laws that rule out EE. ... Conservation of every, conservation of mass, orbital ... Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
    ... >> Bill Hobba wrote: ... >>> Post your email address and I can send you a paper explaining it in the ... >>> context of the other conservation laws such a conservation of momentum. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... The problem is that every experiment that physicists have done to better ... psysicists just don't support the hypotheses of the EE geologists. ... EE scientists are just trying to shift the blame for the failure of ... Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
Quantcast