Re: evidences against subduction theory

On Jul 9, 3:51 pm, J. Taylor <nchiw...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:35:43 -0700, Timberwoof



<timberwoof.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1i10a2x.1tc1clfupi1t0N%firstn...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
firstn...@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Florian) wrote:

Timberwoof <timberwoof.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Okay, then. Explain where the extra mass came from.

Yeah right. Do you really expect that one could reveal you the secret of
the universe while physicists struggle for one century? That is
ludicrous.

So in other words, you have no clue how these violations of laws of
physics could happen. In order to do so, you have to invoke some
unknown, unverifiable, undisprovable (and therefore magic) process. It's
indistinguishable from "God did it."

No one knows where mass comes from, period.

I guess you haven't read many books on modern cosmology.

Google "Big Bang"

Stuart


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... the universe while physicists struggle for one century? ... won't compress to 8X their usual density and matter doesn't magically ... You have no idea what 96% of the matter in the Universe does, ... However, what we do know, rules out Expanding Earth ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... Yeah right. ... Do you really expect that one could reveal you the secret of ... the universe while physicists struggle for one century? ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... Yeah right. ... Do you really expect that one could reveal you the secret of ... the universe while physicists struggle for one century? ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... Yeah right. ... Do you really expect that one could reveal you the secret of ... the universe while physicists struggle for one century? ...
    (sci.geo.geology)