Re: evidences against subduction theory

On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:10:24 -0700, Timberwoof
<timberwoof.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <1184037598.061334.127670@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Stuart <bigdakine@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jul 9, 3:51 pm, J. Taylor <nchiw...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:35:43 -0700, Timberwoof



<timberwoof.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1i10a2x.1tc1clfupi1t0N%firstn...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
firstn...@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Florian) wrote:

Timberwoof <timberwoof.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Okay, then. Explain where the extra mass came from.

Yeah right. Do you really expect that one could reveal you the secret of
the universe while physicists struggle for one century? That is
ludicrous.

So in other words, you have no clue how these violations of laws of
physics could happen. In order to do so, you have to invoke some
unknown, unverifiable, undisprovable (and therefore magic) process. It's
indistinguishable from "God did it."

No one knows where mass comes from, period.

I guess you haven't read many books on modern cosmology.

Google "Big Bang"

The ultimate nature of matter is irrelevant, and bringing it into the
discussion on expanding earth is a smokescreen. What EEers ignore is
what *is* known about matter, and two of those things are that rocks
won't compress to 8X their usual density and matter doesn't magically
appear inside a planet (or any other experimental body).

Did not bring up matter. The way each of you mislead each other is a
study in itself.

JT

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... Stuart wrote: ... the universe while physicists struggle for one century? ... won't compress to 8X their usual density and matter doesn't magically ... Look up Higgs Boson, Higgs Field ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... the universe while physicists struggle for one century? ... The ultimate nature of matter is irrelevant, ... Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Refuting the Big Bang Theory
    ... appeared in talk.origins, posted by Stuart ... matter of any kind did not exist for ... Neutrinos don't have much to do with atomic ... The universe was "opaque" do to the intense energy released by ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... the universe while physicists struggle for one century? ... won't compress to 8X their usual density and matter doesn't magically ... You have no idea what 96% of the matter in the Universe does, ... However, what we do know, rules out Expanding Earth ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Refuting the Big Bang Theory
    ... appeared in talk.origins, posted by Stuart ... matter of any kind did not exist for ... The universe was "opaque" do to the intense energy released by ... That should be "ordinary matter more complex than H and He"; ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading