Re: evidences against subduction theory

In article <j82693hjv07cg2fla0tp0ra7iojjqv38ns@xxxxxxx>,
J. Taylor <nchiwana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:07:52 -0700, Timberwoof
<timberwoof.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <sgp593d3u8gm4stjrtbqodmtius0m0m3pd@xxxxxxx>,
J. Taylor <nchiwana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:40:04 -0700, Timberwoof
<timberwoof.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <1i109u5.1kq0hgl1pbhl63N%firstname@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
firstname@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Florian) wrote:

Timberwoof <timberwoof.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

EE gives no tenable explanation
for how the Earth gained about an order of magnitude in volume (and
presumably mass).

So what? Physicists give no tenable explanation for how mass induces
gravitation. They only give a mathematical decription, nothing else.

Are you going to keep asking that same question, no matter how many
times or how many ways I answer it? Probably: WHen I finally get tired
of the game, you can declare victory and establish once and for all the
"Truth" of earth expansion.

Two centuries of experimentation have found no instance of mass creation

The is would be star date what?

or velocity induction in the manner required for the EE hypothesis.

^ You ignored this line.

The
EE hypothesis offers nothing more than an unverifiable contradiction of
Lavoisier's observations. Meanwhile, EEers demand all unanswered
questions of PT to be answered to the same level as they demand of
physics to explain matter, yet refuse to answer those kinds of questions
themselves about the EE hypothesis.

I do not know is an answer

Well, there question of there the mass comes from is fundamental to the
problem with EE. Without an answer, the hypothesis falls flat.

My position is not based on a hypothesis. It is a claim backed by
evidence. Which has been repeatedly shown

The pattern on the ocean floor shows expansion. Maxlow demonstrated
it.

To deny it requires showing it was not done the way he stated. If you
cannot, it stands.

Once it is accepted you get to ask the next question.

No, I get to ask the "next" question right away, and I don't have to
accept anything until my questons are answered.

And the next question is not how the Earth expanded, but what process
would cause the pattern so that it looks like expansion.

If you wish to claim PT caused the pattern show it. Don't just claim
it, show it.

For me, trying to get PT to fit the pattern has been very enlightening
about PT.

Okay, fine. Forget everything about PT. Even in the absence of an
alternative hypothesis, expanding earth doesn't work.

You are wrong and been repeatedly shown you are wrong is an answer

The pattern on the ocean floor clearly shows expansion is an answer

The fact is you do not want answers you want someone to say AMEN to
help reenforce the dogma you so cherish.

Dogma is unquestioned belief. I have examined and analyzed both
hypotheses. Your accusation of me following dogma is just an unfounded
ad hominem.

Come on, show me you know the meaning of these words, is it an
accusation or an ad hominem?

Yes. But this smokescreen is irrelevant.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ?Chris L.
an important web site: http://www.muslim-refusenik.com/
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... Physicists give no tenable explanation for how mass induces ... "Truth" of earth expansion. ... The pattern on the ocean floor shows expansion. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... "Truth" of earth expansion. ... The pattern on the ocean floor shows expansion. ... Your accusation of me following dogma is just an unfounded ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: paleomagnetism and EE
    ... Maxlow wants for there to be a change in mass. ... Earth has always been considered static in size it has not been ... exponential expansion at the present rate of 21 mm/year, ... intimately related to a cosmological expansion of the Universe, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: paleomagnetism and EE
    ... current continent sizes would be basically pure garbage. ... Maxlow wants for there to be a change in mass. ... Earth has always been considered static in size it has not been ... exponential expansion at the present rate of 21 mm/year, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... However, what we do know, rules out Expanding Earth ... MASS, MASS, MASS you dumbass!! ... two charged component fields. ... How does this help explain Earth expansion? ...
    (sci.geo.geology)