Re: evidences against subduction theory


"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ah36931onqi2ecj03l5g4obdbjrumabmbr@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:10:24 -0700, Timberwoof
<timberwoof.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <1184037598.061334.127670@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Stuart <bigdakine@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jul 9, 3:51 pm, J. Taylor <nchiw...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:35:43 -0700, Timberwoof



<timberwoof.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1i10a2x.1tc1clfupi1t0N%firstn...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
firstn...@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Florian) wrote:

Timberwoof <timberwoof.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Okay, then. Explain where the extra mass came from.

Yeah right. Do you really expect that one could reveal you the
secret of
the universe while physicists struggle for one century? That is
ludicrous.

So in other words, you have no clue how these violations of laws of
physics could happen. In order to do so, you have to invoke some
unknown, unverifiable, undisprovable (and therefore magic) process.
It's
indistinguishable from "God did it."

No one knows where mass comes from, period.

I guess you haven't read many books on modern cosmology.

Google "Big Bang"

The ultimate nature of matter is irrelevant, and bringing it into the
discussion on expanding earth is a smokescreen. What EEers ignore is
what *is* known about matter, and two of those things are that rocks
won't compress to 8X their usual density and matter doesn't magically
appear inside a planet (or any other experimental body).

Did not bring up matter. The way each of you mislead each other is a
study in itself.

Again - explain how you can have an increase in mass without an increase in
matter.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba
    ... > with the remnants of the BB and consider mass as an anomoly? ... of the physical universe is not matter. ... > to abandon that time and substance (energy). ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba
    ... thus making the mass the central figure. ... occupies and affects such a miniscule part of this universe. ... to abandon that time and substance (energy). ... immediately affects matter. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Dark matter ? MOND ? or Something else ?
    ... Fortunately for the universe, reality doesn't care one way or the other ... Molecular clouds were dark matter all the way through the fifties. ... the majority of mass in the universe appears to be ... chance of ever detecting them. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Dark matter ? MOND ? or Something else ?
    ... Fortunately for the universe, reality doesn't care one way or the other ... Molecular clouds were dark matter all the way through the fifties. ... the majority of mass in the universe appears to be ... game to ask whether we really understand gravity. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Masterpiece
    ... >> exist independently of matter. ... The EFE without a nonzero mass term ... >> still has a spacetime solution. ... >> However, in our universe, there happens to be both mass and spacetime, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)