Re: evidences against subduction theory

On Jul 9, 9:14 pm, J. Taylor <nchiw...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:05:04 +1000, "Landy" <n...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"J. Taylor" <nchiw...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ah36931onqi2ecj03l5g4obdbjrumabmbr@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:10:24 -0700, Timberwoof
<timberwoof.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <1184037598.061334.127...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Stuart <bigdak...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jul 9, 3:51 pm, J. Taylor <nchiw...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:35:43 -0700, Timberwoof

<timberwoof.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1i10a2x.1tc1clfupi1t0N%firstn...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
firstn...@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Florian) wrote:

Timberwoof <timberwoof.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Okay, then. Explain where the extra mass came from.

Yeah right. Do you really expect that one could reveal you the
secret of
the universe while physicists struggle for one century? That is
ludicrous.

So in other words, you have no clue how these violations of laws of
physics could happen. In order to do so, you have to invoke some
unknown, unverifiable, undisprovable (and therefore magic) process.
It's
indistinguishable from "God did it."

No one knows where mass comes from, period.

I guess you haven't read many books on modern cosmology.

Google "Big Bang"

The ultimate nature of matter is irrelevant, and bringing it into the
discussion on expanding earth is a smokescreen. What EEers ignore is
what *is* known about matter, and two of those things are that rocks
won't compress to 8X their usual density and matter doesn't magically
appear inside a planet (or any other experimental body).

Did not bring up matter. The way each of you mislead each other is a
study in itself.

Again - explain how you can have an increase in mass without an increase in
matter.

Good question, there is not an answer. It is not known

Look up Higgs Boson, Higgs Field


What does that have to do with expanding earth?

Stuart

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... the universe while physicists struggle for one century? ... discussion on expanding earth is a smokescreen. ... won't compress to 8X their usual density and matter doesn't magically ... Look up Higgs Boson, Higgs Field ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... Stuart wrote: ... the universe while physicists struggle for one century? ... won't compress to 8X their usual density and matter doesn't magically ... Look up Higgs Boson, Higgs Field ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... the universe while physicists struggle for one century? ... discussion on expanding earth is a smokescreen. ... won't compress to 8X their usual density and matter doesn't ... Look up Higgs Boson, Higgs Field ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... the universe while physicists struggle for one century? ... discussion on expanding earth is a smokescreen. ... won't compress to 8X their usual density and matter doesn't ... Look up Higgs Boson, Higgs Field ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... the universe while physicists struggle for one century? ... won't compress to 8X their usual density and matter doesn't magically ... You have no idea what 96% of the matter in the Universe does, ... However, what we do know, rules out Expanding Earth ...
    (sci.geo.geology)