Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: J. Taylor <nchiwana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:37:28 GMT
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:13:01 -0700, Timberwoof
<timberwoof.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1184092131.920348.275000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Stuart <bigdakine@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 9, 9:14 pm, J. Taylor <nchiw...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:05:04 +1000, "Landy" <n...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"J. Taylor" <nchiw...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ah36931onqi2ecj03l5g4obdbjrumabmbr@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:10:24 -0700, Timberwoof
<timberwoof.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1184037598.061334.127...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Stuart <bigdak...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 9, 3:51 pm, J. Taylor <nchiw...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:35:43 -0700, Timberwoof
<timberwoof.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1i10a2x.1tc1clfupi1t0N%firstn...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
firstn...@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Florian) wrote:
Timberwoof <timberwoof.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Okay, then. Explain where the extra mass came from.
Yeah right. Do you really expect that one could reveal you the
secret of
the universe while physicists struggle for one century? That is
ludicrous.
So in other words, you have no clue how these violations of laws of
physics could happen. In order to do so, you have to invoke some
unknown, unverifiable, undisprovable (and therefore magic) process.
It's
indistinguishable from "God did it."
No one knows where mass comes from, period.
I guess you haven't read many books on modern cosmology.
Google "Big Bang"
The ultimate nature of matter is irrelevant, and bringing it into the
discussion on expanding earth is a smokescreen. What EEers ignore is
what *is* known about matter, and two of those things are that rocks
won't compress to 8X their usual density and matter doesn't magically
appear inside a planet (or any other experimental body).
Did not bring up matter. The way each of you mislead each other is a
study in itself.
Again - explain how you can have an increase in mass without an increase in
matter.
Good question, there is not an answer. It is not known
Look up Higgs Boson, Higgs Field
What does that have to do with expanding earth?
Nothing. It's just a smokescreen to deflect attention from the real
issue, which is that neither the Higgs Boson nor the Higgs Field can
explain it. If he knew how that could work, he'd explain it. Instead,
he's trying to figure it out and is sending smarter people than himself
to go research the answer for him.
Your ability for self-deception is phenomenal.
You have no idea what 96% of the matter in the Universe does, and have
no idea where mass come from, but you know Earth expansion is
impossible, and since you KNOW (read believe) it is impossible any
evidence which shows it magically disappears, and in this case, it is
evidence which shows the whole Earth for the last 200 million years.
I suspect it would be easier to de-program a cult member, then to
shake you of your fantasy, you know what you do not.
JT
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Landy
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Stuart
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- References:
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: J . Taylor
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Stuart
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Timberwoof
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: J . Taylor
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Landy
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: J . Taylor
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Stuart
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Timberwoof
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- Prev by Date: Re: evidences against subduction theory
- Next by Date: Re: evidences against subduction theory
- Previous by thread: Re: evidences against subduction theory
- Next by thread: Re: evidences against subduction theory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|