Re: evidences against subduction theory

In article <1184096923.108657.101580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Stuart <bigdakine@xxxxxxx> wrote:

In this universe. Sure there are plenty of things we don't know about
the universe. However, what we do know, rules out Expanding Earth
for now. The onus is on the EEers to either come up with unambiguous
evidence
for expansion or a mechanism for it. Without either of those, they
don't have a theory.

I'd say they have to provide both. If either is missing, the theory
fails.

Claiming that because we don't know everything
that therefore anything is possible is the hallmark of kookdom.

Stuart

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ?Chris L.
an important web site: http://www.muslim-refusenik.com/
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... count for much based a it is on a mere handful of geology, ... seven) and related discipline courses plus voracious reading on the ... Expanding Earth is a weak, dogmatic hypothesis, not even a theory. ... Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... However, what we do know, rules out Expanding Earth ... There are no physic laws that rule out EE. ... Conservation of every, conservation of mass, orbital ... Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com ...
    (sci.geo.geology)