Re: evidences against subduction theory

On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:29:42 +1000, "Landy" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ntv793dolsjm54qge8t254jq6mtuhm2fme@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:40:20 +1000, "Landy" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"J. Taylor" <nchiwana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
snip

You have no idea what 96% of the matter in the Universe does, and have
no idea where mass come from, but you know Earth expansion is
impossible, and since you KNOW (read believe) it is impossible any
evidence which shows it magically disappears, and in this case, it is
evidence which shows the whole Earth for the last 200 million years.

But you ant matter to magically appear - not disappear - inside the earth.
Which is equally absurd. You're the one drowning in self-deception.


So the Earth is hollow? It got there some how

Of course, we know how, billions of years ago, so far back it is
nearly impossible to test, and why do we think back then, because it
got here some how and there is nothing we know going on now, and we
know there is nothing going on because we do not look because it
happened billions of years ago and there is **NO EVIDENCE** to suggest
otherwise, because we ignore any evidence presented because we know
there is nothing going on and it had to be billions of years ago

Just circular reasoning, over and over again.

You obviously misunderstand (what a surprise). YOU are the one that is
wanting the Earth to be
expanding now and over the past 200 My or so. An increase in volume
requires an increase in mass
(note that the inside of the Earth is not gaseous so you can't rely on
density changes of anywhere near the
required magnitude). Therefore, according to EE, you need to be magically
creating matter out of nothing
to do that. I am NOT referring to creation of matter from energy at the
beginning of the universe or the
conversion of H & He etc to heavier elements in stars.

Bill, can you get it through your head matter and mass are NOT the
same thing.

Why don't you read this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson
"Many theorists expect new physics beyond the Standard Model to emerge
at the TeV-scale, based on unsatisfactory properties of the Standard
Model."

It is NOT about creating matter but how matter magically gains mass
out of nothing.

The sad fact, you do not get it (what a surprise)

JT

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... However, what we do know, rules out Expanding Earth ... way for matter to appear in the Earth and make it expand. ... MASS, MASS, MASS you dumbass!! ... question back to the evidence for it, and what was originally stated, ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba
    ... > with the remnants of the BB and consider mass as an anomoly? ... of the physical universe is not matter. ... > to abandon that time and substance (energy). ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Tom Roberts, M-Max, Hobba
    ... thus making the mass the central figure. ... occupies and affects such a miniscule part of this universe. ... to abandon that time and substance (energy). ... immediately affects matter. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... However, what we do know, rules out Expanding Earth ... way for matter to appear in the Earth and make it expand. ... MASS, MASS, MASS you dumbass!! ... question back to the evidence for it, and what was originally stated, ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Dark matter ? MOND ? or Something else ?
    ... Fortunately for the universe, reality doesn't care one way or the other ... Molecular clouds were dark matter all the way through the fifties. ... the majority of mass in the universe appears to be ... chance of ever detecting them. ...
    (sci.physics)