Re: evidences against subduction theory

On Jul 10, 2:11 pm, J. Taylor <nchiw...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:29:31 -0700, Timberwoof

<timberwoof.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1184096923.108657.101...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Stuart <bigdak...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

In this universe. Sure there are plenty of things we don't know about
the universe. However, what we do know, rules out Expanding Earth
for now. The onus is on the EEers to either come up with unambiguous
evidence
for expansion or a mechanism for it. Without either of those, they
don't have a theory.

I'd say they have to provide both. If either is missing, the theory
fails.

The ocean floor showing expansion is unambiguous evidence, but you
would not know because you will not look at it.

The ocean floor shows unambiguous evidence for sea-floor spreading.

If sea-floor spreading was due to expansion, how do you explain
asymmetric spreading, oblique spreading, subduction etc.?



You just keep claiming PT can do, and it cannot,

PT neatly explains the magnetic anomaly patterns on the sea floor
as well as many other features.

Stuart

.