Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Nicolas Krebs <nicolas1.krebs3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:29:17 +0200
J. Taylor écrivit dans l'article
news:kmm893t2jnisp8obtvg52ugml9vipt9ufs@xxxxxxx
"No evidence for expansion" - Stuart Weinstein
Sorry, once again you show your lack of understanding of words,
ambiguous means doubtful or uncertain. The demonstration by Maxlow
could not be more clear, pull the ocean crust out by age, allow the
radius to adjust, see what happens.
The result, all the continental margins came together with a fit of
99% or better.
If the continental plate are not deformed (nor destroyed) in the procesus,
it dont know (i doubt) how 99% plate could fit if i would (i have not yet
done the experience) remove the oceans's floor step by step (by their
age). Siberia and Alaska are linked by Bering (thus can't turn on themself
to close the Pacific if east Pacific plate is plate-removed-youngeed).
There is a triangle of youth plate on south of Alaska. There are two
triangle of ocean plate on west (Arabian sea) and east (bay of Bengal) of
India. Maps and globes can be found in
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/image/crustalimages.html .
P.S.: I have found an evidence of the Europe-Siberia collision (wich made
Ural mountains) in Carboniferous and Permian ( http://www.scotese.com/late.htm ,
http://www.scotese.com/newpage5.htm , http://www.scotese.com/newpage8.htm )
in http://labspace.open.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=168277 section
1.2.4 Figure 5c ("The apparent polar wander paths for Europe and Siberia")
and Question 2 ("the way in which Europe and Siberia have drifted from the
Silurian Period to the present day?"). So Europe and Siberia where not
close togethere before Permian. There was space between. Of course someone
can claim that paleomagnetic reconstitutions ("geomagnetic data") are
wrong...
--
« Fifty years ago, the expanding earth made sense because it had been
discovered that the Atlantic was expanding. But it's time to move on. »
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Aidan Karley
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Florian
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- References:
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: J . Taylor
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Stuart
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: J . Taylor
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Timberwoof
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: J . Taylor
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Stuart
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: J . Taylor
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Timberwoof
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: J . Taylor
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- Prev by Date: Re: evidences against subduction theory
- Next by Date: Re: evidences against subduction theory
- Previous by thread: Re: evidences against subduction theory
- Next by thread: Re: evidences against subduction theory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|