Re: evidences against subduction theory

Nicolas Krebs <nicolas1.krebs3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If the continental plate are not deformed (nor destroyed) in the procesus,

Bad assumption. Continental plate are deformed.

it dont know (i doubt) how 99% plate could fit if i would (i have not yet
done the experience) remove the oceans's floor step by step (by their
age).

Models have been done for more than 70 years. You may have a look at
neal adams reconstitution. (Quicktime is required).

http://www.continuitystudios.net/guestvid.html


Of course it is an approximate reconsitution but it gives a good idea of
what's going on.

See Maxlow's thesis for more accurate models:
http://adt.curtin.edu.au/theses/available/adt-WCU20020117.145715/

[...]

So Europe and Siberia where not
close togethere before Permian.

Note that the Ural mountain is still active while the collision ended
at least hundred million years ago.

[...]

There was space between. Of course someone
can claim that paleomagnetic reconstitutions ("geomagnetic data") are
wrong...

Paleomagnetic data are interpretated using a fix radius. It is a serious
bias. See Maxlow's thesis.

--
Florian

"Tout est au mieux dans le meilleur des mondes possibles"
Voltaire vs Leibniz (1-0)
.