Re: evidences against subduction theory

In article <1i15hfc.15gzgbeqgoe4N%first_name@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
first_name@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Florian) wrote:

Timberwoof <timberwoof.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


As a geologist ignorant of basic principles of particle physics,

Ad hominen => short of arguments.

I suppose you cold come up with some magical ideas that might work.

There is no magic. Magic is for the believers of PT who think that crust
can magically plunge in the mantle although it is less viscous nor
dense.

But he
about of *energy* required to create all the mass that appeared inside
the Earth is pretty huge;

Assuming the density is unchanged and the the growth averages 2.9
km2/year such that the radius growth averages 18mm/year, then the amount
of mass created is 4.65*10E16 kg/year or 1.5*10E9 kg/s and the energy
required is about 1.3 x 10E26 J/s.

maybe you could compare it to the rate at
which the sun converts mass to energy.

That's 4*10E9 kg/s

But if energy to matter conversion occurs inside the earth, one has to
assume that it also happens inside the sun.

Anyway, enough speculations, back to geosciences.

Yeah, let's drop this expanding earth bull***. It requires too many
maybes, what-ifs, unknown behaviors of dark matter, and other
speculation.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ?Chris L.
an important web site: http://www.muslim-refusenik.com/
.