Re: evidences against subduction theory


"Florian" <first_name@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1i1biki.xzv42e1yo3dtfN%first_name@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
George <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Actually, it's the exact same argument that creationists make.

No georgie. Creationists never look for explanations. At the same time
we can't formulate explanations without data to support it.

Exactly. So where is your data that shows that the mass of the Earth has
increased? Where is your data that explains where that mass came from?
Where is your data that shows that the moon is orbiting ever closer to an
Earth that is increasing in mass? You can't even decide when the expansion
started, much less show that it actually has expanded. You don't even
understand the nature of melts, much less understand the impermeable nature
of mantle rock under extremely high pressures. So why should anyone listen
to what you have to say?

George


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... we can't formulate explanations without data to support it. ... So where is your data that shows that the mass of the Earth has ... much less understand the impermeable nature ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... we can't formulate explanations without data to support it. ... So where is your data that shows that the mass of the Earth ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
Loading