Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: J. Taylor <nchiwana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:14:46 GMT
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:38:49 -0700, Stuart <bigdakine@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 13, 6:19 pm, J. Taylor <nchiw...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 00:11:29 -0400, "George" <geo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Florian" <first_name@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1i179ph.1bmpklrp6pn7xN%first_name@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Timberwoof <timberwoof.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, in most sciences, you can not pick and choose your data like that.
No you can't. That why the zodiac fan current position rules out PT.
--
Florian
Ignoring, of course, that the northern boundary of the zodiac fan is
currently being subducted. Ignoring the fact that when the zodiac fan was
located in a different position during the time in question, there were
large slivers of exotic terranes located between it and the mainland, as I
pointed out earlier.
So you think this exotic terrane jump across to another plate? And
that this exotic terranes was as big as half of Alaska?
Big as much of the western US.
The Pacific plate, you know the one with the Zodiac fan, going the
wrong direction
And you think
this exotic terranes was made up of continental material?
Many of them are Island arcs judging by their composition.
"this"
George specifically mentioned ONE
.
- References:
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Florian
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Timberwoof
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Florian
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Timberwoof
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Florian
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: George
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: J . Taylor
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- From: Stuart
- Re: evidences against subduction theory
- Prev by Date: Re: Martian Vegetation On ESA Picture
- Next by Date: Re: evidences against subduction theory
- Previous by thread: Re: evidences against subduction theory
- Next by thread: Re: evidences against subduction theory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|