Re: evidences against subduction theory

Florian écrivit dans l'article
news:1i1dbe6.met0esmd3uujN%first_name@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

From: Florian <first_name@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Are you allowed to use this email address ?

This is not an email address.

Of course it is. It's in the "From:" header field of yours articles,
inside brackets.

It looks like creationisme, isn't it ?

You are the creationist:
<46953db1$0$6739$79c14f64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I was not the first to claim that it "fit of 99% or better" and that
"Continental plate are deformed." I just put those two clues together.

The only world maps in those .pdf (figure 3.17, 3.19, 3.21) are showing
"Conventional" geology.

Oops, i missed fig. 2.1.

Jeez... Try chapter 2.

Well, he, no map.

Then not a single map for EE in the internet.

Try again

I've spend many time last week to search (1). I've found nothing, rien,
nada. If even you, can not give me a planisphere of earth' reconstitution
according EE theory, i'm inclined to think that there is no one in the
internet.

newbie.

lol

1 : including searching in
http://www.wincom.net/earthexp/
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/
http://www.expanding-earth.org/
http://eearthk.com/
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/8098/
http://images.google.com/images?as_q=map&as_epq=expanding+earth
http://www.wanatca.org.au/acotanc/Papers/Maxlow-1/
(...)
At least, i found http://www.geo.arizona.edu/Antevs/ecol438/clsgeogn.gif ,
wich show "GTondwanan Breakup" like speciation (a tree with alone
continent at end of branch), a way of schematise that i did'n see before,
and a good idea.
--
« Fifty years ago, the expanding earth made sense because it had been
discovered that the Atlantic was expanding. But it's time to move on. »
.