Re: evidences against subduction theory

On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:42:30 -0700, Timberwoof
<timberwoof.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <t1fv9399hu1tl4b9as8juqf68a1ih1bg1b@xxxxxxx>,
J. Taylor <nchiwana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:13:16 -0400, "George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


"Florian" <first_name@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1i1h5qy.153vm201p1tkjkN%first_name@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
George <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Nothing Hugler presented is original, and nearly all of it is out of
date.

Develop. give examples, map comparisons...

Nothing Hugler presented is original, and nearly all of it is out of date.


Just like

... J. Taylor. ...

Repeat the same thing over and over
without a bit of evidence ever given to support it.

What is amazing you would repeat the same lie with the same error.
Who is Hugler?

Didn't you once complain about people not properly researching Expanding
Earth?

Could have, don't remember.

But still do not know who in the hell is Hugler.

Florian makes repeated reference to Kugler

Perhaps that is who you mean, if you were actually paying attention.

JT


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... J. Taylor wrote: ... give examples, map comparisons... ... Nothing Hugler presented is original, and nearly all of it is out of date. ... Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... George wrote: ... give examples, map comparisons... ... Nothing Hugler presented is original, and nearly all of it is out of date. ... Voltaire vs Leibniz ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: evidences against subduction theory
    ... give examples, map comparisons... ... Nothing Hugler presented is original, and nearly all of it is out of date. ... What is amazing you would repeat the same lie with the same error. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)