Re: Temperature gradient inside a body with gravity
- From: Jo Schaper <jonot34schaperat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 08:43:05 -0600
And this is supposed to be significant how?
You are working on averages, not temperature gradients at specific
locations. Temp gradients under Yellowstone NP, USA, for example,
greatly exceed the 'average' number. The temp gradient beneath other
places doesn't even reach the 20-25 K/km you cite.
If you are trying to draw some data to justify/deny global warming, it
doesn't strike me that earth's gravitational heat gradient (as you call
it) is anything people can influence without reducing the mass of the
planet. Therefore, it should be considered an overall constant, not a
controllable variable for total heat in the system.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Temperature gradient inside a body with gravity
- From: David Jonsson
- Re: Temperature gradient inside a body with gravity
- References:
- Temperature gradient inside a body with gravity
- From: David Jonsson
- Re: Temperature gradient inside a body with gravity
- From: David Jonsson
- Temperature gradient inside a body with gravity
- Prev by Date: Re: Temperature gradient inside a body with gravity
- Next by Date: Re: Boulders
- Previous by thread: Re: Temperature gradient inside a body with gravity
- Next by thread: Re: Temperature gradient inside a body with gravity
- Index(es):