Re: Geologicpedia
- From: Jo Schaper <jonot34schaperat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:50:03 -0600
Thanks for your comments, Stuart.
I don't think we're that far apart on this one. The difference I see between a Linux development group and a wide open wiki is that in order to make any meaningful contribution to Linux one has to have a basic familiarity with computer programming, and Linux syntax to even enter the conversation on Linux. However, any fool with a keyboard and an opinion can contribute to most wikis.
The Internet enables anyone to be their own publisher. Unfortunately, very few people have the tools or self-discipline to be their own editor as well. Obviously the Conservapedia example you gave is 'edited' after a fashion, in a certain direction. Once control or moderation is put onto a wiki, it may still be an even more useful creation, but something of its essential "wiki-ness" (good info drives out bad info)is lost. Sort of like moderated Usenet.
I wish the original poster well. I know this opinion flies in the face of good scientific protocol, in that who does an experiment shouldn't matter, but the results do-- the older I get, and the more the world fills up with dreck, the more I want to know what the human credentials are behind info I find on the Net. It's easier to find that out from a private website, or a single person blog, or info put out there by a government, school or company than a wiki.
happy holidays to you,
Jo
.
- References:
- Geologicpedia
- From: Simmons
- Re: Geologicpedia
- From: Jo Schaper
- Re: Geologicpedia
- From: Belba Grubb
- Re: Geologicpedia
- From: Jo Schaper
- Re: Geologicpedia
- From: Stuart
- Geologicpedia
- Prev by Date: Re: The rotational dynamic behind plate motion
- Next by Date: Re: Seriously, what is the most exciting phrase to hear in science and in geology?
- Previous by thread: Re: Geologicpedia
- Next by thread: Re: Geologicpedia
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|