Re: FAQS - Earth Expansion



Nicolas Krebs wrote:
don findlay �crivit dans l'article
news:e737b576-fb43-45ed-9957-5f94c13e28ae@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Nicolas Krebs wrote:
don findlay ?crivit dans l'article
news:8a95b5d5-d520-4a68-a58a-8e39180e275f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Is there evidence that the Earth has got bigger?" (past tense) - Then
the answer is yes.

Which evidence (then)?

1. Distension and rupture of a panglobal Mesozoic continental crust
2. Extrusion of the mantle.
3. Mountain belts as eroded plateaus peripheral to active breakthrough
of the mantle (Pacific region - not passive breakthrough - /Atlantic/
Indian/Southern)
4. Back-arc basins (Western Pacific) as the remnant of Pacific
continental disruption.
5. Phanerozoic stratigraphic sequence all on the continental crust.

Thanks for the answer.

Please explain each item,
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/ee/


and (explain) why they are evidence "that the
Earth has got bigger".

Because they show the underlying "convenient assumption" of Plate
Tectonics, "that the Earth cannot be getting bigger"
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/nonsense/subass.html
to be false, and its default position, "If the creation of new
oceanic lithosphere at oceanic ridges were the only process operating,
the Earth clearly would have increased in volume and surface area at a
remarkable rate in the comparatively recent geologic past", to be
true.

What particular bit do you find difficult about this?

Please explain the five (5) item above.

If you look at a map of the world, all the stratigraphic sequence -
from the Cambrian to the present - lies on the continental crust. It
used to lie beneath the sea (more or less), but now it doesn't. It's
been uplifted. *GLOBALLY*. And it's all pretty well flat. Plate
Tectonics cannot account for that. Such a situation is axiomatic in
Earth expansion.

(I'm only shouting because everybody seems to be deaf on this simple
point.)



--
��You say there is evidence. We are all waiting to see it.��
( news:BrdOd.56750$IV5.29302@attbi_s54 2005-02-09)
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: FAQS - Earth Expansion
    ... Phanerozoic stratigraphic sequence all on the continental crust. ... and why they are evidence "that the ... Earth has got bigger". ... oceanic lithosphere at oceanic ridges were the only process operating, ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: FAQS - Earth Expansion
    ... Phanerozoic stratigraphic sequence all on the continental crust. ... and why they are evidence "that the ... Earth has got bigger". ... oceanic lithosphere at oceanic ridges were the only process operating, ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Kook warning, Oriel36
    ... Recognise that the mountain belts of the ocean floors and the ... Antarctic in the continental crust, ... ridge in the mantle (the Atlantic develops later when the Earth ... Movement picture points to the Earth having ruptured around its ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: "Nuclear energy not the solution to global warming"
    ... Uranium preferentially ... go into felsic rocks in preference to mafic rocks. ... of uranium in the continental crust is enriched by orders of magnitude ... over the average U content of the Earth because of this. ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Hades - or Eden?
    ... The Bible declares that when God created the earth everything was "very ... reports on research done by Mark Harrison at the Australian National ... He has discovered that "massive amounts of continental crust were ...
    (uk.religion.christian)