Re: Speculative concept of universal growth was: earth expansion

J. Taylor wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 04:52:57 -0600, josephus <dogbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

don findlay wrote:
Florian wrote:
don findlay <don@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

(Null points - Carey..) Me, ..I think you have to be careful though
how far you speculate otherwise you end up in the same boat as Plate
Tectonics - where the theory *IS* the geology.
That's why it is called "speculation". One of the big issue with plate
tectonics is that they forgot it is precisely a speculation.
That's right. At what point though does that sort of speculation
morph into fact? I think it's when the science field cedes authority
to the publicity machine, particularly the more popular ones, ..and
scientists keep quiet about it - the gung ho misrepresentations that
publicity promulgates for its own ends (selling to the public).
Because the more people who believe the easier it is to publish next
time. That's why it's important to take away that power that the
'Scientific Americans' and suchlike have, and why the wiki is good. Or
could be.

of course Don Findlay and Florian and JT never misrepresent the truth

The only liar here is that inbreed Oaky j0SepHUs

JT

I a irish/scottish native texan. no inbreeding in farm country.

but there is a question about the immaturity of JT. is it due to inbreeding? that would explain the lack of substance.

josephus
- -
I go sailing in the Summer and
look at STARS in the Winter.
"Everybody is igernant, only on differt subjects"
Will Rogers
"it aint what you know that gets you in trouble
it is what you know that aint so"
Josh Billings.
.

Quantcast