Re: Temperature of the Earth's inner core


<lindwall.john@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4bdc7d94-f60f-4aec-a52b-6f0ee192ad7a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you but wtf are you talking about?

JL:

Since you didn't make the customary citation of the text you are replying to
and I see
no other poster above it, my assumption is you have entertained someone on a
blocked
senders' list, which might confirm some reason behind your unfortunate
resort to a certain acronym.

Regards,

Edward Hennessey


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Please dont take offense...
    ... who Google this out may completely lost track of what post I'm refering to. ... > you already know what the poster is replying to. ... I doesn't mind switching actually... ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.language)
  • Re: Newsgroup/forum ettiquette
    ... | Yesterday I posted a query about an issue I am having, with XP, to a 'thread' ... and further that proper internet, and forum, ettiquette ... Unless you were replying to the the orginal question, yes, you hijacked an old thread. ... the poster who created that thread most likely will not care or revisit so long after. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • o/t Quoting previous text, or not (was Re: Neighbor Using My Fence
    ... > Brian, unless you quote a little bit of the message you are replying to, ... > All I can tell is that you seem to be replying to either a poster named ... it seems the response is to: ...
    (misc.consumers.house)
  • Re: compiling 2.6.5 under 9.0
    ... temptation of replying to it" and you went and fucking replied. ... The previous poster actually asked a serious question and raised some ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Re: o/t Quoting previous text, or not (was Re: Neighbor Using My Fence
    ... >> Brian, unless you quote a little bit of the message you are replying to, ... >> All I can tell is that you seem to be replying to either a poster named ... it seems the response is to: ...
    (misc.consumers.house)