Re: Geostationary or rotational dynamics

On Feb 29, 6:35 am, Timberwoof <timberwoof.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In article
<ef92719e-3e1e-4f48-b22b-1d47b0c86...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,





 oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 28, 9:28 am, Timberwoof <timberwoof.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In article
<27fb3978-d116-4c54-aa1d-8901b176e...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
The rub is that you cannot speak of planetary shape
without discussing differential rotation let alone the implications as
the underlying mechanism for crustal motion

As I said, you're free to show your measurements of how much
differential rotation there is and how much you think it's affecting
surface crustal motion.

Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ÐChris L.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I am being honest when I implore you to stick with what you know and
don't bother with planetary shape and differential rotation.Probably a
good dynamicist would recognise that equatorial speed and differential
rotation in not enough by itself to conclude affects on the shape of a
rotating celestial objects but variations in Equatorial speed or
differential rotation or shape is enough to combine all as a set of
generalised dynamical rules.

But you're not a good dynamicist. You haven't the foggiest notion of how
to calculate the effects of the Earth's rotation on its soggy insides.

You,as representative of a geostationary view, design the internal
structure,composition and viscosity of the Earth to support convection
cells whereas the alternative rotational mechanism requires a
different set of criteria,It would be an enjoyable challenge based on
the generalised dynamics,planetary shape owing to the composition and
viscosity of the moltern interior,evolution of surface features and so
on.

Well, then. Let's see it.

That is why many would be reluctant to promote 'convection cells'
nowadays insofar as the internal mechanism dictates so much.You want
to remain with your limited view then that is fine but as I said to
Brad,why would I care to hear of a geostationary Earth point of view.

I'm not  trying to tell you about a geostationary point of view. I'm
asking you to illustrate, with some reasonable scientific analysis, your
differential rotation model.

I don't believe that Earth's rotation has a significant effect on
crustal motion, but I could be convinced otherwise with good data and
theory. But you've never presented any, so why should I change my mind?

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ‹Chris L.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Good luck now, have fun with the geostationary convection cells and
all the 'soggy' inside that goes with it and that is my final response
to you and all others who need convincing or geological
brestfeeding.When an adult shows up to discuss the matter then I will
proceed to demonstate how to use stellar rotational dynamics to
correlate with spherical deviation as applied to this planet.

I do not know is many or any can follow the basic outlines which link
stellar dynamics to spherical deviation,from there to the Earth's
spherical deviation and from there into the internal mechanism which
links shape with crustal motion but you seem happy with your thermally
generated convection cells so I am not going to contend with people
who enjoy these things.

Take care now and do your best with what you believe in,just like Brad
who at least made an attempt to promote convection.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Geostationary or rotational dynamics
    ... the underlying mechanism for crustal motion ... differential rotation there is and how much you think it's ... Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>http://www.timberwoof.com ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Ask a guru a question
    ... To say that the rotation of the earth has an effect on crustal motion is ... dynamics of planetary shape with tectonic activity under a common ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Geostationary or rotational dynamics
    ... the underlying mechanism for crustal motion ... differential rotation there is and how much you think it's affecting ... anyone whom you expect to convince that things are so. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Geostationary or rotational dynamics
    ... without discussing differential rotation let alone the implications as ... the underlying mechanism for crustal motion ... will demonstate how to use stellar rotational dynamics to correlate ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: No offence to the geostationary guys
    ... dynamics and specifically differential rotation of a rotating ... equatorial speed,differential rotation and variations in sphericity ... so well and good however the correlation between geodynamics and ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
Loading