Re: A better working principle

On Mar 18, 7:34 pm, auxotectonics_deletethis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Florian) wrote:
oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Good for you,you want subduction for water generation

?? Whatever.

and don't want it for your balooning Earth.

If you mean by subduction, that odean floor is buried by overthrusting,
then that is ok. But if you believe that the seafloor is literally
plunging in the mantle, you have to be crazy.

Let me show you something:

<http://nachon.free.fr/GE/pacific/Philippines.jpg>

See the Mariana orocline (E145/N20) ? The front is arc-shaped and show
the direction of absolute motion. It is lithosphere pushed from below by
mantle upwelling so that it overrides older seafloor and lithosphere is
stretched at the back of the orocline thus forming a new ridge. These
oroclines are *Everywhere*.

If you can't figure it out, then change of discipline.

--
Florian
"Toute vérité passe par trois phases. D'abord, elle est ridiculisée;
ensuite, elle rencontre une vive opposition avant d'être acceptée comme
une totale évidence" - Arthur Schopenhauer

You only get one shot at promoting your balooning Earth and
considering you used a conventional plate tectonic explanation for the
generation of water what would I have to gain by discussing anything
with a person who can act like a spoilt child an indulge himself in
then concluding subduction does not exist Biological evolution is
always intimately linked with plate motiom and I love that side of
geology too much to care for somebody who only traffics in surface
correlations.

The unfortunate part is that plate tectonics as a whole
package,demonstrating the forces acting on the Earth internally and
astronomically,fossil data,climatological elements ect will be
undermined by junk concepts such as your own .As the person who uses
differential rotation as the common link between planetary shape and
crustal motion my only concern is that 'convection cells' do not
undermine plate tectonics rather than dealing with the worthless junk
in your head.

Many are sucked into asking about 'mass' but I enjoy that the Earth's
climate and geology has not changed much since the dinosaurs and
mammals roamed the planet.There is nothing to be gained by believing
otherwise unless you have an addiction for exotic junk as is now found
in astronomy.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A better working principle
    ... If you mean by subduction, that odean floor is buried by overthrusting, ... No, no, no, ...You're confusing Plate Tectonics with continental ... ...which is also about Earth expansion. ... undermine plate tectonics rather than dealing with the worthless junk ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Dons blog
    ... > movement in the oceanic crust. ... mechanically no difference between subduction and overriding, ... Expansion [is in the mantle]. ... >> it's clear that plate tectonics has the disadvantage of size? ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Owens Two-Phase Model of Earth Expansion
    ... transform fault scarps - nothing to do with thermal contraction. ... Plate tectonics says that the ridge rifts ... but subduction is precluded in an Expansion ... > margins could act as a wedge or lever to lift the continents. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Dons blog
    ... if there is no subduction, then 'ANY IDIOT CAN SEE THAT THE ... The 'If' is precisely the rationale that plate tectonics uses to ... at the section and plan you post, and tell me why not 'overriding'. ... To my interpretation that is precisely what that illustration shows. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Earth expansion - puzzled......
    ... Larry shows it he only takes into account the longitudinal one parallel ... instead of subduction on account of 1. ... negation of the factors supporting plate tectonics. ... talk about that zone without taking into account the larger picture ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
Loading