Re: Theory of formation of the moon

On 19 mar, 17:02, Timberwoof <timberwoof.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In article
<544d2af3-169f-429d-9073-f22ff5b61...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,

 sir.jpturc...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On 19 mar, 05:40, Timberwoof <timberwoof.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In article
<f04db1bb-3fae-4b05-b9c8-fe87976a3...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,

 sir.jean-paul.turc...@xxxxxxx wrote:
... at this level of idiocy billions or millions do not matter at
all !

Don't be an ***. Ignorance can be cured.
*> > Well,  this is good news since I thought your ignorance was
*> > definitive. A little ray of hope then.
*>
*> No, I didn't actually expect you to not be an ***.



Well, 2 negations + another negation lead to a negation...
A clear application of Murphy's law :
"When embarrassed mumble"

You apparentlly shot yourself in the foot ... a typical case of
ignorance indeed !


.

Quantcast