Re: 9,81 and the "Expanding Earth"

J. Taylor wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:51:36 -0600, josephus <dogbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

J. Taylor wrote:
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 07:54:20 -0600, josephus <dogbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

J. Taylor wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 22:49:40 -0600, josephus <dogbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

J. Taylor wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 10:46:02 -0600, josephus <dogbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

J. Taylor wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:05:51 -0600, josephus <dogbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

J. Taylor wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 01:59:30 -0600, josephus <dogbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

J. Taylor wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 10:00:15 +0100, Nicolas Krebs
<nicolas1.krebs3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

J. Taylor écrivit dans l'article news:n34jn35qhnv0lfa80uqd4ov31o16ebqdvp@xxxxxxx

all the oceans have the same pattern as the Atlantic
According to http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/image/crustalimages.html , it's wrong. Do you have evidence of the contrary?
It is just you, that does not know what he is talking about, no
surprise there.

Why don't you total up the percentage of age, for each age, in all the
oceans, then get back to me.

JT

JT you have not answered the question : what is the average density of the earth. V*density = mass. you said it had nothing to do with mass and that makes JT ignorant and a liar.

Since I did not say that, could not possibly be a lie, but it does
still make you to stupid to be able to read.

JT
lest put to you this way
You can put it any way you want and it will not make the saying of
what was not.

You are still an idiot.

JT
just remember stupid, I am an astronomer
Josephus Widows your backyard telescope does not make you any more of
an astronomer than your bird feeder makes you an ornithologist.

and I have been studying
the black hole at the core of the milky way. I have been looking at the published data. and discovered that the obvious tightest orbit is tilted at about 30 degrees and tilted back at about 45 degrees. the published data says r min is 17 hrs and that works out to 17 mm , the video shows 5 mm. BH grow you know and orbits change. our orbits are stable for similar reasons. it means EE is junk and it is strictly false.
If you think it just has to be one or the other then the record on the
ocean floor is vastly more extensive and with greater detail than
black holes, but must remember is this all according to j0sePhuS

if the earth increases for any reason, the moons orbit will change. and if the sun changes all kinds of people would notice. so nothing has magic mass increases.
Guess it would then need to be real then, since you have ruled out
magic.

JT

it is clear you dont know anything about astronomy and you dont know anything about celestial mechanics. it requires calculus, and relativity for you is just plain magic because newton + relatavistic terms = reality. and it all indicates EE is a pipe dream and bogus to boot. MASS DOES NOT CHANGE like EE claims.
Would you please prove one reference, just one, where someone
supporting EE has ever made that claim.

florian said so, and so did JT all of you claimed that EE was science and that mass just appeared with all the right stuff. and the rest of the science community fell down laughing.
No, I have never said that, and Florian has speculated, and you
lacking any integrity twist and distort

Any one who uses you as a source will not have the last laugh.



See the real problem here is you and a few other bozos like to make
thing up then argue against it to prove the planet has not expanded.

I know you are not aware of this, or can you comprehend the
significance, but the evidence of the age pattern on the ocean floor
is very extraordinary evidence and when the paleomagnetic lining up on
the continents after being joined together is over whelming.

overwhelming notingness. it is not regular enough to provide expansion. and expansion has problems with consistency. why do the contintents move and why do the plates move. EE claims the earth is expanding, and forgets stuff like INDIA and NA sitting on the east pacific rise.
Of course, you do not know what you are talking about.

really, when INDIA took off and crashed into ASIA,

It never happened.

you think I made that UP? you are seriously stupid. what do you think caused the Himalayas?

Uplifting and torsion.


You should not be wasting your time trying to show all the ways it
could not happen but looking for the one way it did. It has all the
potential to open up entire new fields of scientific research.

JT
ONE WAY IT DID? ok I can make up stuff just like JT. He says magic mass JUST HAPPENS. or was florian. EE is SSDD
I said no such thing, magic mass is your claim, and if you had the
intellect to figure things out you would not need to lie about what
others said.
what do you think MASS appearing with all the RIGHT STUFF, and not affecting celestial mechanics, and not causing various bodies to collide, clearly that is magic by definition.

That is a creationist argument you are making. If it was not made by
a loving G-d why does food taste so good? It is the same argument
when you say the "right stuff" It assumes you know what is right.

As for affecting celestial mechanics, the evidence to know whether it
did or did not, does not allow the question to be answered with
certainty. There is more than enough room for other factors.

So what we really have is not magic, but your sloppy thinking, again.


you know that claim of mass having the right stuff is florian's claim. it does not help you to refute florian. he is EE like you. so it just means you two guys disagree about EE and that means also that EE has no basis in fact, contrary to any claims you or florian make.

and you don't seem to know anything about celestial mechanics. it requires mathematical ability. EE cannot do any mathematics because celestial mechanics refutes EE if it is honest.

josephus

--
I go sailing in the summer
and look at stars in the winter,
"Everybody is ignorant but on
different subjects"
--Will Rogers
Its not what you know
that gets you in trouble
its what you know that ain so.
--josh billings.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 9,81 and the "Expanding Earth"
    ... Do you have evidence of the contrary? ... V*density = mass. ... No, I have never said that, and Florian has speculated, and you ... affecting celestial mechanics, and not causing various bodies to ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: 9,81 and the "Expanding Earth"
    ... Do you have evidence of the contrary? ... V*density = mass. ... BH grow you know and orbits change. ... No, I have never said that, and Florian has speculated, and you ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: The Universal Mind
    ... > produce the laboratory notebooks to support this) and never come ... > If you think that there is evidence to support your assertions, ... > increasing the mass. ... > That means it has to fall to the earth from somewhere else in the ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: 9,81 and the "Expanding Earth"
    ... Do you have evidence of the contrary? ... you said it had nothing to do with mass and that makes JT ignorant and a liar. ... BH grow you know and orbits change. ... He says magic mass JUST HAPPENS. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Debunking Josephus
    ... not possible, without direct observations. ... The same if the mass is not constant and we don't know the rate of mass ... that shows florian only believes things he sees on the web. ... Just another lie ...
    (sci.geo.geology)