Re: Seismic waves, density and temperature.

On Apr 6, 12:34 am, Stuart <bigdak...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 5, 2:08 am, oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Apr 5, 12:50 pm, Stuart <bigdak...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 4, 10:52 pm, auxotectonics_deletethis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

(Florian) wrote:
don findlay <d...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Stuart wrote:

Define "plastic". Give me a rheology.

...and stuart will give you another number.

A french geologist told me a joke recently.
I really love it. I try a translation:

What's 2 times 2?
A mathematician answers right away: 4!
A geologist, hesitates a bit, but finally answers: that must be 4.
Then a geophysicist: How much do you want?

Feel free to improve the translation :-)

A geophysicist walks into a McDonalds and orders a whopper.

Indeed !,a geophysicist would only ask for something that is not on
the menu - try Burger King.

LOL.

I hardly eat fast food anymore.

Stuart- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I have to scratch my head and wonder what it is about the motion of
the fractured crust using the motions of the Earth as an influence
that is so difficult for everybody here.If people,with an image of the
Earth before them, try to imagine 'convection cells' they will fail -

http://www.blog.thesietch.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/earth.jpg

If the geodynamics,specifically differential rotation of the interior
composition, is great enough to generate a 40km sperical deviation
between polar and equatorial diameters,it most certainly is enough to
have surface geological effects.

Like the new orbital component before it,geodynamical influences on
geological evolution were meant to bring a breath of fresh air to the
topics,however,the hostility towards the new and observed orbital
component is by far more distressing given that it's effects in terms
of the variations between daylight and darkness are the most immediate
after day and night caused by axial rotation.The spectacular failure
may be due to the absence of a background,a depth that cannot be
imposed or substituted by a 'scientific method' and now repetition of
the chain of reasoning leading to geological and climatological
effects looks like an appeal when it most certainly is not.









.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
    ... That probably has more to do with the influence of gravity dependent on ... an object's particular location wrt the Earth. ... Since motion is ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The theory of relativity
    ... heliocentricity for a non ... slowly in the outer lanes can appreciate the Copernican reasoning as ... The heiocentric version is no different as the Earth overtakes the ... Now I will provide the actual time lapse footage of heliocentric motion ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Earth rotation
    ... the false contention that constant axial rotation through 360 degrees ... You are bound to consider the motions of the Earth - axial and orbital ... distinct and seperate motion ... axial and equatorial orientation remains constant throughout an annual ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Explaining Time Dilation
    ... Saying 'the rocket is in motion along its world line.' ... A world line is a plot of position ... here - it would only trace out a free particle world line if the earth was ... a mathematical object your statements are obviously without content. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Newtons Principia: Definitions: I - IV
    ... The motion of the whole is the sum of the motions of all the parts; ... Of this sort is gravity, by which bodies tend to the centre of the ... earth, but would go off from it in a right line, and that with an ... accelerates all falling bodies, whether heavy or light, great or ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)