Re: Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- From: Stevepppp@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 11:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
On May 21, 9:56 am, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Google newsgroup spook/mole name of "Timberwoof" should be clue
enough, not to mention his/her tactics of consistently topic/author
stalking and bashing for sport, while otherwise contributing as little
if anything constructive, or much less representing anything
objective.
Well known trolls like that one are a dime a dozen in ngs. That's a
plus because as the saying goes "give a fool enough rope.." Their
attempts at smearing others only backfires. They havn't the
intelligence nor foresight to understand this. Furthermore, you can
learn from a Troll, just read the opposite of what they say and you
will likely be near the truth.
.
- References:
- Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- From: Stevepppp
- Re: Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- From: Timberwoof
- Re: Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- From: Stevepppp
- Re: Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- From: Stevepppp
- Re: Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- From: BradGuth
- Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- Prev by Date: Re: Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- Next by Date: Re: Mining Undersea Volcano Vents
- Previous by thread: Re: Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- Next by thread: Re: Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
