Re: Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- From: Aidan Karley <name1_name2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 01:04:17 +0100
In article <267b652f-c586-40fb-ab71-
41e3c24e176c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
As Brad Guth puts it I address the following to all future trollsStevepppp, just a FYI : Timberwoof may be one of the more abrasive
including the last one:
characters in this little corner of USENET, but he's not a troll. He
disagreed with you without being startlingly rude, and presented well-
founded points to address many of the problems you perceive. That's
being constructive and educational in my book. If you don't like having
holes picked in your pet theories, that's your lookout.
Personally, I suspect that you're a sock puppet for Brad Guth.
--
Aidan Karley, FGS,
Aberdeen, Scotland
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- From: Stevepppp
- Re: Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- From: Timberwoof
- Re: Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- References:
- Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- From: Stevepppp
- Re: Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- From: Timberwoof
- Re: Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- From: Stevepppp
- Re: Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- From: Stevepppp
- Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- Prev by Date: Re: Mining Undersea Volcano Vents
- Next by Date: Re: Phoenix Lands on Mars this Sunday!!! To Examine Martian Water Ice
- Previous by thread: Re: Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- Next by thread: Re: Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading