Re: Origin of the Moon .. pro/con Collision Theory arguments invited

On May 21, 5:04 pm, Aidan Karley <name1_na...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In article <267b652f-c586-40fb-ab71-41e3c24e1...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,  wrote:
As Brad Guth puts it I address the following to all future trolls
including the last one:

Stevepppp, just a FYI : Timberwoof may be one of the more abrasive
characters in this little corner of USENET,
I don't give him that much credit.

but he's not a troll.
Keep dreaming. True, he's lost his edge lately as a troll, hitting a
few ontopic softballs. He needs to be reschooled as a troll.

He disagreed with you without being startlingly rude,

Not "startling" rude, but just rude? I have no problem with an
occasional rude comment backed by substance. Blatent misquotes and
lies (scroll up for a living example here) are much worse.

and presented well-
founded points to address many of the problems you perceive.

80% of his vomit is just that. Too little substance, glaringly wrong
where there is substance, or inserting links to notorious b.s. sites
which he believes are chiseled by God .. taken right out of the pages
of the Troll For Dummies handbook.

That's
being constructive and educational in my book.

Like your input here, it's not.

If you don't like having
holes picked in your pet theories, that's your lookout.

I welcome it. Read the headline. Pick away. if you can't without lying
fine. Expect to be blacklisted as a Troll. You might even become one
yourself.


Personally, I suspect that you're a sock puppet for Brad Guth.

Try again Sherlock, wrong puppet. The only ontopic issue I somewhat
agree with Guth is the collision theory, I'm not 100% convinced of
that, he seems 0% convinced. Scroll back and you'll find I've been
opposed to nearly everything Guth says. About the only subject we
agree on is when it comes to sniffing out trolls.

Guth also happens to stay on topic more than most of the trolls you
admire.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: RGP KKK
    ... Another troll. ... You did not write anything of substance here. ... I guess these are the people the Republicans are against giving ... "these are the people the Republicans are against giving health care" ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: Y&R -- Victorias Baby
    ... fact that maybe she didn't actually lose the baby. ... Its fun ... Who do you consider to be a troll? ... Also - one tiny additional question, you say you'll apologize in advance for being rude - does this mean you always know when someone else will consider your post rude? ...
    (rec.arts.tv.soaps.cbs)
  • Re: Recently diagnosed
    ... Some people on this ng are extremely rude for no ... but Susan will be ... as far as the others telling Dana not to talk to me. ... to troll. ...
    (alt.support.diabetes)
  • Re: OT..I need info concerning alabama
    ... a troll is someone who comes into an established ... Did my post concerning looking up chucks building permit contain rude, ... The act of calling me a troll, as done by denny, was in itself "trolling" ... is posting an inflamatory message designed ...
    (alt.vacation.las-vegas)
  • Re: Nostra Aetate-The Vaticans Position on Anti-Semitism
    ... He's not a troll, even though he behaves that way. ... considers that the rest of us are simply victimizing him. ... Sorry, from where I sit you are the one who is not only rude and insulting, ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)