Re: Celebtonics



sir.jpturc...@xxxxxxx wrote:

On 31 mai, 14:59, don findlay <d...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

... and plate tectonics is only part of the lunacy.
Have you by the way some data on the upraise of the Sichuan areas
consecutive to that quake. I consider the ground must have been
raising between 1 to 5 m in part
( as in Bandah Aceh in 2004 by the way )

Very likely. That animation of Florian's showing the cluster on
India's right-hand Horn -- wouldn't like to be living there.. Poor
Folk. They're not being served very well by the bright shining
dollars of convectional Plate Tectonics. They go on about the
westwards movement of the Pacific Plate when virtually the entirety of
deformation in that part of the world is transverse to that, ..as
anyone with a few brain cells can see. They're much more concerned
with maintaining the myths of subduction for the sake of security of
publication, and the spin offs that consensus careers offer, than they
are with looking seriously at the safety of the region. These guys
are not *entirely* fools. They know exactly which side of Stuart's
"Gift that Keeps on Giving" is the butter on their bread.


jp
.

Quantcast