Re: Floppy
- From: J. Taylor <nchiwana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:08:08 -0700
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:30:08 +0200, Nicolas Krebs
<nicolas1.krebs3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
J. Taylor écrivit dans l'article
news:70csa4l3a21up24rh2vm997m6l8j65o24r@xxxxxxx
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:04:03 +0200, Nicolas Krebs
<nicolas1.krebs3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Indeed. "You say there is evidence. We are all waiting to see it."
( news:BrdOd.56750$IV5.29302@attbi_s54#line=89,90 , 2005-20-09, 42 month
ago)
The age pattern on the ocean floor.
Explain.
The age pattern is only the result of two possibilities, 1:) constant
radius with old crust being removed to equal the addition of new
crust. 2:) radius increase which cause surface enlargement.
It can ONLY be produced by
expansion,
Evidence?
Simple deduction by a process of elimination of what fits with length,
width, height and time.
and it has been repeatedly been shown why
Message-ID?
twaddle left for reference
RTFM and learn how to quote.
Have no idea what you are talking about, since I did not quote but
just left the remained of the post unaltered.
Which is prohibited by netiquette.
The rules of quoting are not subject to netiquette. You are wrong and
now wish invoke something equally meaningless.
someone such as you that simply makes
statements without the slightest regard for having something to do
with anything.
Libel?
Fact, and just provided further support.
JT
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Floppy
- From: Nicolas Krebs
- Re: Floppy
- References:
- Floppy
- From: George
- Re: Floppy
- From: J . Taylor
- Re: Floppy
- From: Nicolas Krebs
- Re: Floppy
- From: Nicolas Krebs
- Floppy
- Prev by Date: Re: The pseudo miracles of Plate tectonics Zealots
- Next by Date: Re: Floppy
- Previous by thread: Re: Floppy
- Next by thread: Re: Floppy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
