Re: Our zealot is still struggling with the buoyancy principle... pathetic


"Florian" <auxotectonics_deletethis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1im8f0l.3ivzh2vnb2bnN%auxotectonics_deletethis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
George <George@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Don't you realize that you're the single idiot who claims that a slab
less dense than the mantle can sink to the bottom? Don't you know that
geophysicist insist that the slab is denser by evoking eclogitization?

Don't you realize that a majority of Earth scientists agree with me?

More denial...

Tell that to Stern who gaves a scenario to explain why slabs would be
denser than the asthenosphere!

Stern constitutes a majority? I don't think so.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/Ice_water.jpg

Jeez...Can't you understand that the correct analogy is to put your
cube
of iron in a swimming pool of lead!? And of course, you would continue
to claim that the cube would sink to the bottom of the pool...

Let's add some high heat and pressure to that scenario, shall we? And
then
we'll see how the localized iron (which is not spread out over the entire
pool) acts on the lead.

Iron float over lead because it is less dense.
You're welcome to continue to act like an idiot.

Does ice ALWAYS float over water?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/Ice_water.jpg

I don't think so. Do you deny what your eyes are telling you when you look
at that picture? Do you even have ice in that padded cell of yours?

George


.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast