Re: more struggle with the buoyancy principle for our brilliant hydrogeologist.
- From: "George" <George@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 01:12:49 -0400
"Florian" <auxotectonics_deletethis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1iomcom.4utrg91t7mu0zN%auxotectonics_deletethis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
George <George@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And there is certainly one. Period.
Really? Perhaps you could enlighten the planet as to what that one is?
Idiot. Don't you understand that scientists do not know everything? Only
crank can imagine that scientist know everything but simply want to hide
it.
You don't know much. That much is certain. That you understand even less
is much more certain. Bye now.
George
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: more struggle with the buoyancy principle for our brilliant hydrogeologist.
- From: Florian
- Re: more struggle with the buoyancy principle for our brilliant hydrogeologist.
- From: sir . jean-paul . turcaud
- Re: more struggle with the buoyancy principle for our brilliant hydrogeologist.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Where did the extra mass come from?
- Next by Date: Re: Now, our famous geologist confuses continental rift and ocean.
- Previous by thread: Re: more struggle with the buoyancy principle for our brilliant hydrogeologist.
- Next by thread: Re: more struggle with the buoyancy principle for our brilliant hydrogeologist.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
