Re: Ancient Magma 'Superpiles' May Have Shaped The Continents
- From: mike3 <mike4ty4@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 02:14:02 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 22 2008, 7:47 pm, auxotectonics_deletethis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Florian) wrote:
brad <lbjohnson1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:<snip>
On Dec 19, 5:54 pm, auxotectonics_deletethis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Florian) wrote:
Your constant failure to identify evidences incompatible with plate
tectonics and supporting planetary growth theory is quite amazing.
Let's all rewrite Physics .And Chemistry , too , just for good
measure . And
all Mathematics is suspect....
Only idiot would think that one must rewrite Physics or whatever your
fantasm tells you. George is one of them. Are you?
I'd agree with George. It does require a rewriting of physics. If not,
then
tell me where the matter comes from, and how atomic xeroxing works,
all using known physics. If you claim known physical theory is
_wrong_,
then you have contradicted yourself, as you are saying above that we
do
_not_ need to rewrite physics.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ancient Magma 'Superpiles' May Have Shaped The Continents
- From: J. Taylor
- Re: Ancient Magma 'Superpiles' May Have Shaped The Continents
- From: Florian
- Re: Ancient Magma 'Superpiles' May Have Shaped The Continents
- From: jpturcaud
- Re: Ancient Magma 'Superpiles' May Have Shaped The Continents
- Prev by Date: What happened to it?
- Next by Date: Re: Really interesting paleogeographic map suggests ocean basins opening and closing repeatedly in the same place?
- Previous by thread: Re: Ancient Magma 'Superpiles' May Have Shaped The Continents
- Next by thread: Re: Ancient Magma 'Superpiles' May Have Shaped The Continents
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading