Re: Ancient Magma 'Superpiles' May Have Shaped The Continents

On Jan 7, 11:14 am, mike3 <mike4...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 22 2008, 7:47 pm, auxotectonics_deletethis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx(Florian) wrote:
brad <lbjohnson1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 19, 5:54 pm, auxotectonics_deletethis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Florian) wrote:
Your constant failure to identify evidences incompatible with plate
tectonics and supporting planetary growth theory is quite amazing.

Let's all rewrite Physics .And Chemistry , too , just for good
measure . And
all Mathematics is suspect....

Only idiot would think that one must rewrite Physics or whatever your
fantasm tells you. George is one of them. Are you?

<snip>

I'd agree with George. It does require a rewriting of physics. If not,
then
tell me where the matter comes from, and how atomic xeroxing works,
all using known physics. If you claim known physical theory is
_wrong_,
then you have contradicted yourself, as you are saying above that we
do
_not_ need to rewrite physics.

Yes it does require a rewriting of Physics & Florian is right on that
one.

Still for the normal run-of-the-mill Villain, the Flat Earth &
Ptolomic system of rotating Sun is okay & satisfies to all their
needs ... so does the phlogistic system in Chemistry, the spontaneous
generation in biology and Plate Tectonics in Geology ( or so called)
In fact this is a matter of level of conscience & awareness. It has
been like that since the beginning of time indeed leading to all known
forms of religions.
There is a need in the primitive mind to worship what he does not
understand : It starts with the Thunder & Lightning and end with Plate
Tectonics now !

Jean-Paul Turcaud
Australia Mining Pioneer
Founder of the True Geology
.

Relevant Pages