Re: Ancient Magma 'Superpiles' May Have Shaped The Continents
- From: "J. Taylor" <nchiwana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:03:02 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 7, 6:27 pm, "George" <Geo...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"J. Taylor" <nchiw...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:cc27842f-4f24-4b85-b6c1-e2452d38093d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 7, 2:14 am, mike3 <mike4...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 22 2008, 7:47 pm,
auxotectonics_deletethis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx(Florian) wrote:
brad <lbjohnson1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 19, 5:54 pm, auxotectonics_deletethis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Florian) wrote:
Your constant failure to identify evidences incompatible with plate
tectonics and supporting planetary growth theory is quite amazing..
Let's all rewrite Physics .And Chemistry , too , just for good
measure . And
all Mathematics is suspect....
Only idiot would think that one must rewrite Physics or whatever your
fantasm tells you. George is one of them. Are you?
<snip>
I'd agree with George. It does require a rewriting of physics. If not,
then
tell me where the matter comes from, and how atomic xeroxing works,
all using known physics. If you claim known physical theory is
_wrong_,
then you have contradicted yourself, as you are saying above that we
do
_not_ need to rewrite physics.
You need a subscription to read ithttp://www.nature.com/news/2008/081120/full/news.2008.1246.html
You need a subscription to read it
Here is someone blogging on ithttp://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/11/21/confirmed-scient...
"Particle physics explains that the bulk of atoms is made up of
protons and neutrons, which are themselves composed of smaller
particles known as quarks, which in turn are bound by gluons. The odd
thing is this: the mass of gluons is zero and the mass of quarks
[accounts for] only five percent. Where, therefore, is the missing 95
percent? "
So let's see, 96% of the Universe is made up of Dark matter/energy
And the 4% we can see is made up of 95% "....from the way they
interact"
Which, if my math is correct, is only .2% we know much about
I don't think we will be closing the book any time soon because we
know it all.
JT
=========
This explains where the extra mass comes from, how? How does this extra
mass magically appearing inside the Earth prevent the moon's orbit from
going haywire? Basically, answer all the questions I've already asked,
Taylor, instead of avoiding them. You're clutching at straws again.
95% of mass is nothing more than energy
November 2007 issue National Geographic page 147
"It may well be that dark energy is inherent to space itself.
Physicists
had long suspected that such a 'vacuum energy' must exist, since
quantum
fields, which contain energy, permeate even the emptiest voids out
between the galaxies. Yet when physicists calculate the amount of
energy in the vacuum they get absurdly large results, ranging from
infinite ('that can't be right,' Nobel laureate physicist Steven
Weinberg, mused) to zillions of times more than is required even to
account for the mighty force of dark energy. The disparity troubles
them; Weinberg calls it 'the worst failure of an order-of-magnitude
estimate in the history of science.' Clearly, something is wrong with
either the observations (but no error has yet been found, in many
ongoing studies with Hubble and other telescopes) or with the
consensus models of physics and cosmology, which for all their flaws
stand as one of the grandest attainments of modern science"
Sorry, George, but if you were not such an idiot you too would have
made the connection.
It is about energy
JT
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Really interesting paleogeographic map suggests ocean basins opening and closing repeatedly in the same place?
- Next by Date: Re: Ancient Magma 'Superpiles' May Have Shaped The Continents
- Previous by thread: Re: Ancient Magma 'Superpiles' May Have Shaped The Continents
- Next by thread: Re: Ancient Magma 'Superpiles' May Have Shaped The Continents
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
