Re: Quartz Origins (Uh-Oh, Another Geology Post)
- From: Jo Schaper <jo34schaper31@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 07:55:15 -0600
Bruce Bathurst wrote:
On Jan 7, 11:37 am, Jo Schaper <jo345sch765a...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Bruce Bathurst wrote:On Jan 6, 12:36 pm, Jo Schaper <jo34schape...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:As I noted somewhere else in the thread, I just carry a old OTC nasalNone of the dolomite in Missouri (unless it is actually pink crystals)Jo,
is made properly, but I already know that, so I use other ways to
determine what carbonate I'm dealing with. *|:-)
The oxalic acid crystals I used may occasionally have been citric acid
crystals - whichever was available at the time. Truly, I never carried
a plastic bottle of dilute hydrochloric acid on my belt, which always
seemed excessive.
spray bottle with HCL clearly marked on it, I double bag it in ziplocks,
and it's in the pack, not on my belt. Never had an issue with it, since
that tiny squeeze spray hole is going to drip at best, even if the screw
on cap came off.
However, this requires practicing with various known carbonateMost of my field work is done in Paleozoic (Cambrian-Mississippian,
minerals before leaving for the field. You alluded once before to
powdered dolomite not fizzing in an appropriate acid. This I've never
encountered nor heard of; and it is important to geologists. I have no
explanation, other than it's being a different carbonate. If it didn't
fizz when powdered, how did you identify it as dolomite?
occasionally Pennsylvanian) carbonates which are an
insane mix of of limestones, secondary dolostones, mudstones and thin
crumbly shales. The sandstones are pretty discrete; but the other three
sometimes interlayered and gradational. For the most part, the rock
units around here are named as Potosi Dolomite, St. Louis Limestone,
etc., so you would think knowing what unit it is in would be diagnostic,
but because the dolostones are of the replacement variety, actual
lithology varies quite widely. It is fairly easy to tell the limestones
from the dolomites by texture; once you get the sparry limestones out of
the mix, most of the limestones (grading into mudstone) are powdery, and
rather soft; the dolostones are gritty, compact and generally harder.
What confuses things even more are those incompletely dolomitized; it's
not that unusual to have fossils retained in the dolomite-- i.e. the
rock will not fizz, it's not shaley or muddy, but is carbonate and has
fossils in it. I've also picked out limestone exposures in putative
dolomites-- the book and the map says it should be dolomite, but it
fizzes like crazy. What prompts me to test such rock? Its texture and
eyeball muddiness.
I'm sure this method is non-scientific, and I don't expect it to work in
an unfamiliar area, so I'm not advocating it. But that's what I like
about geology-- every time you put information in little boxes, some of
it thumbs its nose at you and does the Nah-Nah-Nahnahnah! dance.
Yes, I don't think it's in keeping with recommended nomenclature to
call a formation with various carbonates a 'Dolomite' or 'Limestone'
unless they were named long ago. If it doesn't fizz when powdered, one
must ask whether it is magnesian limestone (with Mg > 15%), dolomite,
or mixtures including other carbonates.
The formation names are what they are, and around here they include the lithology, unless they consist of known mixtures of the base rock. The Bonne Terre, is the Bonne Terre Formation, because it is a mix, and everyone recognizes it.
Originally, these all were called 1st, 2nd, etc magnesian limestones. However, the term magnesian limestone to me is indistinguishable from secondary dolomite. With one possible exception, none of the Missouri dolomites are primary dolomites. No one locally uses magnesian limestone any more, as that term is 100 years out of date.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Quartz Origins (Uh-Oh, Another Geology Post)
- From: Bruce Bathurst
- Re: Quartz Origins (Uh-Oh, Another Geology Post)
- References:
- Re: Quartz Origins (Uh-Oh, Another Geology Post)
- From: Joe
- Re: Quartz Origins (Uh-Oh, Another Geology Post)
- From: Jo Schaper
- Re: Quartz Origins (Uh-Oh, Another Geology Post)
- From: Joe
- Re: Quartz Origins (Uh-Oh, Another Geology Post)
- From: Bruce Bathurst
- Re: Quartz Origins (Uh-Oh, Another Geology Post)
- From: Jo Schaper
- Re: Quartz Origins (Uh-Oh, Another Geology Post)
- From: Bruce Bathurst
- Re: Quartz Origins (Uh-Oh, Another Geology Post)
- From: Bruce Bathurst
- Re: Quartz Origins (Uh-Oh, Another Geology Post)
- Prev by Date: Re: Ancient Magma 'Superpiles' May Have Shaped The Continents
- Next by Date: Re: Why are Island Arcs arced?
- Previous by thread: Re: Quartz Origins (Uh-Oh, Another Geology Post)
- Next by thread: Re: Quartz Origins (Uh-Oh, Another Geology Post)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|