Re: A testing time..

On Feb 8, 5:40 pm, brad <lbjohnson1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 8, 7:15 am, oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

That's Dr Bathurst to you; and I certainly have no wish to engage in
catty conversations by men on gossipy subjects. Thanks anyway.

Fair enough doctor,the gossip of the Earth's rotation and its
geological effects  is unlikely to appeal to you so I suggest you
spend more time baking cookies and attending to your health.

You don't need to know a whit of Geology to understand the fallacy of
your paradigm. What is the strength of G? Is the planet's rotation a
function of G ?
How many orders of magnitude greater is EM? Is heat being released by
the Earth?
 Is heat released by convection or conduction? Is heat EM? Contemplate
these
 questions and incorporate them into your position.


My paradigm indeed !,I simply enjoy working with the spherical
deviation of the planet in terms of the differential rotation of the
viscous interior which then allows me to look for geological
indicators for that internal mechanism.You simply ignore planetary
shape and rotation and design the interior around a stationary Earth
concept and as far as I am concerned,you and the doctor here are
welcome to it.There is crustal development off the mid-Atlantic ridge
and the orientation of that ridge itself and the symmetry ofcrust
either side of the ridge,how you are going to explain that using
global size 'convection cells' but I do not want to hear it as it
amounts to descending to a stationary Earth paradigm and I am not
about to do that.


I owe
nothing to the doctorates in existence today and that is why I am
productive in making those necessary large scale adjustments from a
stationary Earth thermal 'convection cell' mechanism to the specifics
of rotational dynamics of the viscous interior and subsequently a
proper treatment of the interior composition and viscosity designed
around rotational dynamics.

And that is the basis for your lack of understanding!

You live in a realm created by scientists,or rather,physicists in the
early part of the last century and you know what,it was never healthy
and does nothing for the joy and the passion of life.

And you understand nothing of the *mind expanding* results of that
revolution.


The poor guys in the mid 19th century tried to alter things but the
'scientific method' is like the rudder on the Titanic,its steering
mechanism is so limited that it cannot change course and subsequently
heads for the rocks via the absurdity of a thermal 'convection cell'
mechanism.All the handwringing of "intense research and debate " about
the mechanism for crustal motion other than convection is simply the
sound of guys who have painted themselves into a corner.

Rotational dynamics provides a better arrangement of large scale
geological features by virtue of the fact that the correlation between
equatorial speed and shape is already taken into account by guys
looking at rotating stars but they omit that differential rotation is
a common factor linking deviation with the movement of a fluid from
Equatoria to polar regions.


Even the meekest
response here to a geological point,some flaw or some strength can be
looked upon and applied to physical considerations and as long as a
person retains that spirit of youth regardless of physical age

Expand your logic in the ways I posted above.

or condition,for that is what wisdom is,then no life is ever
wasted.Jonathan Swift,a fairtly good observer of the weeknesses that
people succumb to,expresses something of the self-absorbed condition
you have found yourself in

If anyone ever was limited to the sole recognition of his own faults
in others
you are that person!

Is your *audience* suitably impressed?

Brad

Ultimately,you and the rest here end up as guys who cannot take into
account that the Earth is round because of rotation and the specifics
of this are that it is not perfectly round due to the dynamics of the
rotating viscous composition beneath the fractured crust.I wouldn't
even bother with whether people are impressed or not as the point is
that the person I would wish to understand the principles which link
rotational dynamics with geological consequences can admire how
planetary shape links with crustal motion under a common dynamic/
mechanism.

The doctor knows where he stands,these guys are ten a penny ,do not
last long and retreat to their comfort zone where they belong.What is
happening is a slow morphing from the certainty of 'convection cells'
to a different point of view where "intense research and debate" is
going on .I have seen this scientists at this juncture before in
astronomy but rather than dump the troublesome and erroneous
viewpoints they created a bigger can of worms and the ee guys should
be thrilled with this.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: New Insights Into Convection In Planets And Stars
    ... the burning desire to defend a point.I do mind that plate tectonics is ... being diluted by an abysmal 'convection cell' mechanism but there is ... which has no links with rotation or its consequences.At least he comes ... evolutionary geology by the combatative ebb and flow between ee and ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: New Insights Into Convection In Planets And Stars
    ... the burning desire to defend a point.I do mind that plate tectonics is ... want to put your rotation on top of plates? ... but I can see a linkage between astronomy and geology for the first ... Recognising 'convection cells' as an ad hoc mechanism does not seem ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Jumping to bovine conclusions
    ... landmass is the next largest geological feature - the mid-Atlantic ... crustal evolution and motion tends to follow the daily rotation of the ... rotational dynamics  does not feature in evolutionary geology but then ... experience of raw geology certainly had an effect on my approach to ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Plates and Equatorial bulge use same mechanism
    ... >> as you describe it will be the arrival of theorists to hijack the ... > Geology to wit "Back Engineering", ... agenda applied to planetary motion that never worked to begin ... discovered and this is the way differential rotation is approached.It ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Plate Tectonics Information
    ... there is a good  reason to believe that differential rotation is ... aversion to rotational dynamics and there is nothing I can do about ... differential rotation and forget coriolis forces for a while - ... Here is what you do,stick with your geostationary convection cells ...
    (sci.geo.geology)