Re: Earth's dimensions
- From: oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 03:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 29, 3:53 am, palsing <pnals...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 28, 4:02 pm, oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:...
it would make you ill to
know that natural noon is unequal...
Why wouldn't I know this? It is common knowledge, and we all know
this.
I am not going to chase you around after your insistence that the
planet rotates to noon in 24 hours for the explanations of both
Huygens and Harrison should be enough for anyone,that it isn't shifts
the conversation from the technical details behind rotation in 24
hours to this holocaust condition where people are complicit or
indifferent to that obnoxious 'sidereal vs solar time' hoax .I rightly
draw the analogies with the Nazi mentality and make no mistake about
it,that aggressive assault on all the great astronomical and
technical achievements which are summed up in the simple fact that the
Earth rotates once in 24 hours by displacing it with a 'sidereal time'
value is absolutely toxic for things such as the relationship between
planetary dynamics and evolutionary geology.
"In those times there was darkness everywhere. In heaven and on earth,
all the gates of compassion seemed to have been closed. The killer
killed and the Jews died and the outside world adopted an attitude
either of complicity or of indifference. Only a few had the courage to
care." Elie Wiesel
The destruction of timekeeping and structural astronomy happens,not
because you can conjure up whatever nonsense you wish without
objection ,but because everyone else is indifferent and no genuine
authority exists.
We also all know that a star returns to the 'sticks' in 23:56:04
each and every night, like... like... clockwork. That is also common
knowledge. Tell us, why does the length of the solar day vary every
day and only averages to 24 hours, and the sidereal day doesn't vary
at all and is timed to 23:56"04? Would it make you ill to explain
this? If you can't or won't explain it, well, no one here would be
surprised, since you have no clue about the role that frames of
reference figure in all of this.
Geology (from Greek: γη, gê, "earth"; and λόγος, logos, "speech" lit.
to talk about the earth)
Geologists cannot absolve themselves from the fact that each
geographical degree at the Equator is 1669.8 km giving a total
Equatorial circumference of 40,075 km and organised around daily
rotation the Earth will turn its full circumference at a rate of 15
degrees per hour and 24 hours for a full revolution.That fact relies
on appreciation of the core timekeeping system that was created in
remote antiquity which contemporaries refuse to do with this late 17
th century 'sidereal time' aberration and how geologists can accept a
'sidereal time' value for 1674.4 km for 15 degrees of rotation making
a nonsensical 40,200 km Equatorial circumference is anyone's guess.
I am not about to present the details of how the equable day/calendar
system,the one people here use day in and day out,was put together in
antiquity with this present unrelenting hostility toward basic
planetary facts.The original system is so stable and so magnificent
that the 11 minute difference between the 365 days 5 hours 49 minutes
raw orbital cycle and the calendar correction had already grown to 10
days in 1582 when Gregory reset the calendar system back to the raw
astronomical cycle.Because of its structure which allows the 24 hours
of Monday to turn into the 24 hours of Tuesday ect,create a linear
progression of years out of a raw astronomical cycle,allow people to
locate their position on the planet's surface using clocks and
rotation in 24 hours ,the system came from the mind of one person.
The Earth does not turn to noon in 24 hours yet the 'sidereal time'
hoax is based on the idea that it does
How can you possibly consider the sidereal day to be a hoax when it is
such a simple thing for anyone to measure? Sidereal time has nothing
to do with solar time, sidereal time is based on the simplest of
measurements, and you or anyone else can do it themself, no need to
take anyone's word for it. This is a totally undeniable fact, and even
you cannot deny this. Or can you? To do so only makes everything else
you say that much more suspect.
After you insist that the Earth turns to the Sun/noon in 24 hours you
still persist when Huygen's instructs you that it does not and how the
24 hour day is extracted from natural noon -
"Draw a Meridian line upon a floor and then hang two plummets, each by
a small thred or wire, directly over the said Meridian, at the
distance of some 2. feet or more one from the other, as the smalness
of the thred will admit. When the middle of the Sun (the Eye being
placed so, as to bring both the threds into one line) appears to be in
the same line exactly you are then immediately to set the Watch, not
precisely to the hour of 12. but by so much less, as is the Aequation
of the day by the Table"
http://www.xs4all.nl/~adcs/Huygens/06/kort-E.html
You continue to be completely unteachable. I have yet to see you admit
to learning anything from anyone here, or on any other forum.
I look at a common history which encompasses some of the great human
achievements and even though the fact that the Earth turns once in 24
hours looks simple,there is a sprawling history behind it that the
late 17th century 'sidereal time vs solar time' hoaxers have not be
able to extinguish.
I actually applaud you that you will stand and fight your corner,it is
those who are silently complicit or indifferent,and especially
geologists,who come under the most severe criticism.I will explain
someday how that great unknown genius in antiquity came up with the
interlocking system which creates both the core calendar system/
equable day scaffolding on which modern timekeeping is built but not
among people who cannot even acknowledge the system built on clocks,
terrestrial geography and longitude and explained by Harrison and
Huygens is an enjoyable way.You can read how those mean spirited
people tried to wreck Harrison's achievement by putting his watch in
direct sunlight (page 101) in order to throw off it pace because that
was their nature,just like yours -
http://books.google.ie/books?id=8roAAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA89&dq=remarks
When scientists can convince the world that rotation is not 24 hours
through 360 degrees and call me mad for promoting it then surely
somebody has some sense to know something is badly wrong,not just the
simple fact but the whole reasoning behind it.
"Experience teaches only the teachable."
~ Vernon Law
.
- References:
- Earth's dimensions
- From: oriel36
- Re: Earth's dimensions
- From: Jim Willemin
- Re: Earth's dimensions
- From: oriel36
- Re: Earth's dimensions
- From: palsing
- Re: Earth's dimensions
- From: oriel36
- Re: Earth's dimensions
- From: palsing
- Re: Earth's dimensions
- From: oriel36
- Re: Earth's dimensions
- From: palsing
- Earth's dimensions
- Prev by Date: Re: Earth's dimensions
- Next by Date: "discrete sampling" - what does it mean?
- Previous by thread: Re: Earth's dimensions
- Next by thread: BCC Meteorites challenges Russian and other lunar landing hoaxers with evidence.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|