Re: 'Earthshine' fall heats global warming debate
From: Roger Coppock (rcoppock_at_adnc.com)
Date: 06/03/04
- Next message: Dave: "hi red GRIB files"
- Previous message: D. Martin: "deadly meteor strike in June?"
- In reply to: steve: "Re: 'Earthshine' fall heats global warming debate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 3 Jun 2004 15:47:37 -0700
steve <steve@nospam.net> wrote in message news:<hAbvc.169$4Z.65911@news.uswest.net>...
> Roger posted this one a while back with out a response.
>
> So what is the earth's albedo?
>
> a) 29%
> b) 30%
> c) 31%
> d) 32%
> e) 32.4%
> f) all of the above
> g) who knows?
> h) doesn't matter because it's fairly constant.
>
>
I would go here to answer your question:
http://ingrid.ldeo.columbia.edu/SOURCES/.NASA/.ERBE/
>
>
> Roger Coppock wrote:
> > 19:00 27 May 04
> > NewScientist.com news service
> >
> > A new study of earthshine, the sunlight reflected back onto the Moon
> > from our planet, suggests that falling cloud cover could explain the
> > warming of the Earth's lower atmosphere seen over the last 20 years.
> >
> > The idea presents a highly controversial alternative to most
> > scientists' prime suspect for the warming - rising levels of
> > greenhouse gases. However, although other researchers say the
> > technique could produce useful data in the future, they argue the
> > current study is simply not strong enough to draw meaningful
> > conclusions.
> >
> > The new study, published in Science, was conducted by Enric Palle and
> > colleagues at the Big Bear Solar Observatory in California and the
> > California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. They report that the
> > brightness of earthshine decreased steadily during the period 1984 to
> > 2000, although that trend appears to have reversed since.
> >
> > The decline suggests fewer clouds, which reflect sunlight, and
> > therefore that more sunlight has been making it into the lower
> > atmosphere (troposphere). That change is "consistent with the large
> > tropospheric warming that has occurred over the most recent decades",
> > they write.
> >
> > Why cloud cover should have thinned is "the big question that no-one
> > knows how to answer," says Palle. "We associate it with natural
> > climate variability, but that's really another way of saying we don't
> > know."
> >
> >
> > Pinch of salt
> >
> > However, Bruce Wielicki from the NASA Langley Research Centre in
> > Hampton, Virginia, says that a link between earthshine and
> > tropospheric warming "cannot be concluded or even implied from these
> > results". And John Harries, an expert in earth observation at Imperial
> > College in London, UK, recommends taking the study's conclusions "with
> > a pinch of salt".
> >
> > Wielicki leads the science team of a mission called CERES - the Clouds
> > and the Earth's Radiant Energy System - which has instruments on three
> > satellites measuring both the amount of visible light reflected by the
> > Earth and the amount of infrared radiation it is emitting.
> >
> > Without measuring both, he explains, you cannot infer anything about
> > warming. CERES data, for example, show that clouds not only reflect
> > lots of visible light, they also act like a blanket and trap infrared
> > radiation in the lower atmosphere. The two effects almost cancel out,
> > so there is little overall change in the energy the atmosphere
> > retains.
> >
> > A further objection is that direct telescope measurements of
> > earthshine in Palle's study only start in 1998. The data for the
> > previous 14 years is based on . . .
> >
> > The rest of this article is at:
> > http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99995048
- Next message: Dave: "hi red GRIB files"
- Previous message: D. Martin: "deadly meteor strike in June?"
- In reply to: steve: "Re: 'Earthshine' fall heats global warming debate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|