Re: Why scientists should not set science policy
From: Doug Haxton (dlhaxton_at_comcast.net)
Date: 07/10/04
- Next message: Doug Haxton: "Re: Why scientists should not set science policy"
- Previous message: Robert Flory: "Re: Rigging a Volcano"
- In reply to: Josh Halpern: "Re: Why scientists should not set science policy"
- Next in thread: Ian St. John: "Re: Why scientists should not set science policy"
- Reply: Ian St. John: "Re: Why scientists should not set science policy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 05:00:23 GMT
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 01:57:06 GMT, Josh Halpern
<j.halpern@incoming.verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>Doug Haxton wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 17:39:19 -0500, Paul Bramscher
>>
>>
>>>You're describing the Bush administration or religion more accurately
>>>than science. Science presents falsifiable theories. The
>>>religious-right and neocons present unalterable orthodoxy.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>As does the religious left...
>>
>
>You mean the churches?
Some churches are on the Left, certainly.
Doug
- Next message: Doug Haxton: "Re: Why scientists should not set science policy"
- Previous message: Robert Flory: "Re: Rigging a Volcano"
- In reply to: Josh Halpern: "Re: Why scientists should not set science policy"
- Next in thread: Ian St. John: "Re: Why scientists should not set science policy"
- Reply: Ian St. John: "Re: Why scientists should not set science policy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]