Re: Why scientists should not set science policy
From: Ian St. John (istjohn_at_noemail.ca)
Date: 07/10/04
- Next message: Bjorn Viaene: "BBC: Heat across the world and still stormy in parts of Europe."
- Previous message: Bjorn Viaene: "sunny weather at the beach..."
- In reply to: Doug Haxton: "Re: Why scientists should not set science policy"
- Next in thread: Vote for Baradnik...or even Nader,...anyone but Shrub OR Kerry: "Re: Why scientists should not set science policy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 09:16:42 -0400
Doug Haxton wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 01:57:06 GMT, Josh Halpern
> <j.halpern@incoming.verizon.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Doug Haxton wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 17:39:19 -0500, Paul Bramscher
>>>
>>>
>>>> You're describing the Bush administration or religion more
>>>> accurately than science. Science presents falsifiable theories.
>>>> The religious-right and neocons present unalterable orthodoxy.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> As does the religious left...
>>>
>>
>> You mean the churches?
>
> Some churches are on the Left, certainly.
Just check to see if the address is odd or even. But it also depends on
which way you are facing... ;-)
More to the point, churches tend to the be the ultimate rightwing example,
with a purely hierachical structure.
>
> Doug
- Next message: Bjorn Viaene: "BBC: Heat across the world and still stormy in parts of Europe."
- Previous message: Bjorn Viaene: "sunny weather at the beach..."
- In reply to: Doug Haxton: "Re: Why scientists should not set science policy"
- Next in thread: Vote for Baradnik...or even Nader,...anyone but Shrub OR Kerry: "Re: Why scientists should not set science policy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]