Re: Geostrophic winds cannot be exactly parallel to isobars
From: Scott (ScottLWI_at_mouse-potato.com)
Date: 08/27/04
- Next message: Scott: "Re: Geostrophic winds cannot be exactly parallel to isobars"
- Previous message: Rico X. Partay: "Re: California Zooms Toward Finish Line for Global Warming Standard"
- In reply to: O18-C-O16: "Re: Geostrophic winds cannot be exactly parallel to isobars"
- Next in thread: I R A Darth Aggie: "Re: Geostrophic winds cannot be exactly parallel to isobars"
- Reply: I R A Darth Aggie: "Re: Geostrophic winds cannot be exactly parallel to isobars"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:49:27 -0500
O18-C-O16 wrote:
> Now you have got me twisting in agony, the coriolis force is an
> imagined force with the purpose of saving artillerist from complicated
> math and learn school children basic meterological skills. Its real
That's okay, the geostrophic wind is imaginary too :)
Scott
- Next message: Scott: "Re: Geostrophic winds cannot be exactly parallel to isobars"
- Previous message: Rico X. Partay: "Re: California Zooms Toward Finish Line for Global Warming Standard"
- In reply to: O18-C-O16: "Re: Geostrophic winds cannot be exactly parallel to isobars"
- Next in thread: I R A Darth Aggie: "Re: Geostrophic winds cannot be exactly parallel to isobars"
- Reply: I R A Darth Aggie: "Re: Geostrophic winds cannot be exactly parallel to isobars"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]