Re: Geostrophic winds cannot be exactly parallel to isobars
From: I R A Darth Aggie (hfrarg_at_nttvr2x3.pbgfr.arg)
Date: 08/27/04
- Next message: Ian St. John: "Re: Dave Keeling: Global warming expert shares 50 years of research"
- Previous message: SwimJim: "Re: Dave Keeling: Global warming expert shares 50 years of research"
- In reply to: Scott: "Re: Geostrophic winds cannot be exactly parallel to isobars"
- Next in thread: Yokel: "Re: Geostrophic winds cannot be exactly parallel to isobars"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 27 Aug 2004 16:36:06 GMT
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:49:27 -0500,
Scott <ScottLWI@mouse-potato.com>, in
<412f5807$0$1341$80265adb@spool.cs.wisc.edu> wrote:
>+ O18-C-O16 wrote:
>+ > Now you have got me twisting in agony, the coriolis force is an
>+ > imagined force with the purpose of saving artillerist from complicated
>+ > math and learn school children basic meterological skills. Its real
>+
>+ That's okay, the geostrophic wind is imaginary too :)
Heh. I've had baby meteorologists try to tell me the thermal wind is
real, too...
James
-- Consulting Minister for Consultants, DNRC I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good, either. I am BOFH. Resistance is futile. Your network will be assimilated.
- Next message: Ian St. John: "Re: Dave Keeling: Global warming expert shares 50 years of research"
- Previous message: SwimJim: "Re: Dave Keeling: Global warming expert shares 50 years of research"
- In reply to: Scott: "Re: Geostrophic winds cannot be exactly parallel to isobars"
- Next in thread: Yokel: "Re: Geostrophic winds cannot be exactly parallel to isobars"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|